[quote]Herriman wrote:
"Kara Goucher never said she wasn't ever on Cytomel or a patient of Dr. Brown. She simply said that Alberto told her to take Cytomel early in 2011 when didn't have a prescription for it and that allegation stands."
Then at best Kara was trying to mislead everyone.
To say "well, I was on Cytomel and my Dr prescribed it, but on one particular day my prescription hadn't been renewed and AS told me to borrow Galen's". Is a much different story than "AS asked me to take some of Galen's prescription meds."
You see? At best she is totaly misleading everyone if she actually had a prescription for the meds and took them regularly and just didn't have a current prescription that day."
This is very fair.
Since the allegations came out, there was not one second where I thought that Salazar could possibly provide a reasonable explanation for all of these allegations. However, the thoroughness of his response today was actually shocking.
I think people need to look at this with some objectivity. The burden of proof should be on the prosecution, but was instead provided by the accused and in a manner that provides some very serious backing to his testimony. There are signed letters from multiple medical professionals that back up Salazar's testimony in refuting these allegations. Additionally, at a minimum (as the subtext in the quote on the front page currently uses to describe the NOP's actions, as being "at a minimum prescription drug abuse"), it should be clear that the credibility of the accusers is certainly questionable. Even if you were to somehow overlook all of the evidence provided, which include medical documentation, contact with USADA/WADA (the very agencies one running a doping program would likely avoid), and written contact presenting a very different past-private and present-public relationship between the accusers and the accused, it's clear that Magness and the Gouchers both deliberately misled Epstein or the public when they stated their reasons for leaving the project and all the horrible feelings and uneasiness that they felt towards the team and Alberto in the years that they were there. That was shown to be blatantly false and you can't pretend that this has no effect on their credibility when, of all the material that is being contended, this is one area that has indisputably been shown to be a lie. It's not as significant as the allegations themselves, but it does provide a motive and some doubt as to the legitimacy of their claims.
As for the allegations themselves, I think that those are more able to be debated. But I think that Salazar has done enough to vindicate himself. Based on everything that has been presented by both sides, it is far, far more probably that the story that he has presented is more truthful than the story presented by ProPublica. That is my opinion, but I think that if anyone is considering this thing from a neutral position, that this is what the evidence and testimony present.
I'll also say that I definitely did not believe that at first, and now I believe that I was wrong.