Objections to John Stiner's statements to the press are 100 percent synonymous with denying that Salazar has done anything seriously wrong. I know this because everyone who has questioned Stiner's statements has also expressed doubts about the validity of the accusations against Salazar, even if they have done so by trying to dress these doubts up in bullshit and false concessions, like "xenonscreams" has.
So let's look at the reasons given for doubting Stiner's testimony. I see only two:
1. I heard he was abrasive from a Facebook friend.
2. His ex-wife hasn't expressly come forward to back up what he had said.
Never mind that 1. is as irrelevant as irrelevant gets and 2. is *not* equivalent to "his ex-wife REFUTES his testimony." If these are the only things people can produce for not taking John Stiner at his word, then we might as well take Al Sal and cast him into a lake of molten lava right now.
But I guess we'll have to wait another week, ten days for that.