Where does Grant Fisher fit in the discussion of the greatest HS distance runners of all-time? To be eligible for consideration, athletes should be dominant in both XC and track (obviously). Here is my take:
1) Jim Ryun - there is really no question about this. He was ranked #4 in the world by T&F news while still in HS. Had the Olympics fallen during his senior season, he would have been a legitimate medal threat. While Webb surpassed Ryun's 3:55.3, he certainly didn't have the "big boys" shaking in their boots (ie El G, Ngeny, Bernie, and so on).
2) Gerry Lindgren - Similarly to Ryun, Lindgren was mixing it up with the world's best as a high schooler. He beat the Russians before starting college and placed 9th in the Olympics. It is well-documented that Billy Mills felt as though Lindgren would have won gold in '64 had he been fully healthy.
3) Lukas Verzbicas - I know, I know. He sucked at a Oregon, was not a team player, and then switched to tris. All of these things are absolutely deplorable. However, he was THE MAN in high school. Absolutely unbeatable in both cross-country and track for two years. When he toed the line in any HS race from 1600m on up, there was no question as to who the winner would be.
4) Grant Fisher - Same boat as Lukas. Seemingly invincible on the HS level. In my opinion, this is what separates the two of them from Webb and Ritz. Webb is arguably the second best HS track runner ever (behind Ryun) and Ritz is the undisputed king of XC. However, they were not strong enough in their "secondary sports" to be ranked ahead of LV or Grant. Ritz was "only" a 4:05 miler; Webb couldn't stay within 100m of Ritz at Footlocker.
5-8 (no particular order): Webb, Ritz, German, Virgin
I would be interested to hear what others think.