De Grasse says F*ck the field-- 9.75/19.58!!!

De Grasse is Canadian and has Canadian citizenship

Like Levins, he will have no problem making it to Beijing

While drugs could be a possibility. What evidence is there for drugs beyond his improvement. At the eyeball level he looks clean and track and field is a non revenue sport for USC so what is the incentive to supply him a Balco type drug plan. Also if you did supply him some Balco type drug plan he would just turn pro anyway and would be lost to USC.....

yeppers wrote:

what in the... wrote:

Who IS this guy??

Sure they were wind-aided, but goodness...

I think it's safe to say that when the favorite gets beaten (blown-away) and by someone who runs NCAA all-time fastest (though wind-aided) in 2 events within an hour, then something is fishy. SOMETHING IS FISHY!

So something's fishy because he beat what some know-it-alls decided was the favorite?

What's fishy is the knowledge level of the people in the media and this site that decided Bromell was the favorite. In NCAA indoors Bromell barely beat de Grasse in the #2 and #7 fastest indoor 200s ever run. De Grasse ran 9.87w at Mt. Sac and 20.03 at Pac-12s to break the Canadian National Record set by Aaron Brown of USC last year. Going into the 100, Bromell was slightly ahead on legal times (10.02 to 10.04) but in the 200, both Dukes and de Grasse were ahead of Bromell. Caryl Smith-Gilbert, one of if not the best sprint coach in the world now, had the peak set up better than Baylor did.

So the people who decided that Bromell was the favorite in both sprints didn't know what they were talking about and are now removing the egg from their faces. That's what's fishy here.

Test Him Now!!!! - I'll totally give him the benefit of the doubt and believe fully in what he just achieved - when I see some test results! His progression is absolutely believable and expected - he looks like the real deal! But..... Make everything completely public and transparent from the start and then when he does beat Gatlin - it will be more shame in his soul for the lie, he [Gatlin] has been living!

Let's do this differently - play their testing game right from the start all they want; morning, noon and night and then..... then if something does go wrong - sue the F'in $hit out of them!!!! Also, publicly showcase his "support team" and ask whether they can be trusted or not to do him justice when they split those Diamonds League winnings and appearance fees!

He needs to allow himself NOT to be a victim of the system!!!!

Funny that a bunch of people are talking about how de Grasse has to be doping, but nobody says a word about Jenna Prandini after English Gardner went from 11.56 as a high school senior to 11.03 at Oregon in ONE YEAR.

Test de Grasse AND Prandini, but I don't think the Ducks would dare go for that one.

Now we're waiting for the usual "IGF-1/ LR3 guy" to come and tell us how these guys are using...

obvious dopers..

not possible without igf1 lr3

ulimate combo of peptides

young sprinters all over it

a joke. Test em now

corrupt ncaa

Did I impersonate him well ? Well, given his weird syntax, I hope I did.

If you missed the races, you can watch them and read about them here:

http://www.letsrun.com/news/2015/06/video-results-and-recap-of-uscs-anthony-de-grasses-amazing-9-75-and-19-58-ncaa-double/

Affiliate hyiomytrecj wrote:

Anyone know his previous PRs?

IAAF.org

"...He spent most of high school going nowhere fast, hanging out with a rough crowd, doing drugs, looking for acceptance in all the wrong places.,,"

What's the difference here with drug-aided 16 y.o HS sensation Galen Rupp?

Victoria94 wrote:

Here's who....http://www.ocregister.com/articles/grasse-661654-sharpe-life.html

The OCR article says he hung with a rough crowd and did drugs in HS. Is it just me or is it more likely if someone is doing illegal recreational drugs, they're probably not hesitant to try performance enhancing drugs.

Yeah. Most people who use alcohol, marijuana or cocaine in their youth amount to nothing in life.

No lie props to U$C I never knew they had a track and field team until this year I mean 40.5 points for 5th is huge for them. Will U$C ever come close to touching Oregon in track no but they do have some good sprinters. Also I read A-Jackson wanted a college for track and Football and he picked U$C over Oregon LOL he will never win a Pac 12 let alone a National Championship in football or track like he would have at Oregon. 7 WIN Steve might be the worst coach in the Country for football but that man can flat out recruit.Still pissed that Juju smith picked U$C over Oregon when Oregon gots 100 times nicer facilities then U$C 5 times the stadium hotter cheerleaders 1 million times nicer location then U$C let's face it U$C is the ghetto and you have to worry about getting shot walking to the stadium it's a rough rough area to say the least Oregon had 1,000 times the coaching staff 5-10 times the team that U$C does a billion times nicer locker room/s then U$C I mean my high school had a nicer looker room then U$C does lol Oregon has way way more wicked Uniforms then U$C in all sports really :) honestly the Only thing U$C has over Oregon is warmer weather. Honestly I think Smith got paid because no recruit in their right mind would pick U$C over Oregon for Football let alone track and field. Can't wait to see if the Oregon Women can break the curse of finishing 2nd like what 5 years in a row? no I think they got 4th last year and 2nd the 4 years prior.

douglas burke wrote:

Bolt ran 9.58 for shutting down at 60 meters, and 19.19 easing up in a 200.

There was no "shutting down" or "easing up" in those runs.

This is truly one of the stupidest posts here in weeks. Maybe you are confused with his Beijing 9.69 / 19.30. You seem a bit senile.

douglas burke wrote:

Notice Gatlin is not racing Bolt tomorrow in New York, Gatlin won't race Bolt in any races except Worlds and Olympics because Gatlin and his manager know Bolt will beat Gatlin easily and hurt Gatlin's marketability.

Bolt is ducking Gatlin, not vice-versa.

is it just me or wrote:

Victoria94 wrote:

Here's who....http://www.ocregister.com/articles/grasse-661654-sharpe-life.html

The OCR article says he hung with a rough crowd and did drugs in HS. Is it just me or is it more likely if someone is doing illegal recreational drugs, they're probably not hesitant to try performance enhancing drugs.

Since you ask, this is a moronic conclusion.

Test Him NOW!!!!! wrote:

Test Him Now!!!!

For what? Testosterone?

His build doesn't exactly scream "steroids" does it? He doesn't look more than 160-165 pounds!

Which makes sense, since just two years ago he was listed at 150 and probably lighter than that:

rupp-certified saladbar wrote:

There was no "shutting down" or "easing up" in those runs.

You're mostly right. Although that 9.58 race wasn't "perfect". If you look closely, he didn't even drive hard to the line and his dive was a little out of time. Bolt thought (and said in some interviews) that his limit was in the low 9.5x's (and some people said 9.48 with perfect conditions). But then, JADCO "affaire" imploded.

19.19 was "the perfect race" until Yohan Blake ran 19.26 (running an average curve)

With the new JADCO staff, Bolt and Blake are not going to run faster.

How old are, twelve?

'SC has won 26 NCAA titles in track. Oregon has won 7.

This is Caryl's second season and she has them rocking. I can tell you that the Oregon coaches know who to look out for in the upcoming years.

If you know anything about Southern California every kid down there wants to go to 'SC. I doubt that you've ever been near their campus.

Did you see his backward arm movement? Will that be the new thing? He is so small in built. It looks like he could also run a good 300m.

I was impressed that he didn't looked jacked at all.