Regarding point one, you very well may be correct, but playing the percentages with anything does not discount an alternative. Probability never equals absolute and your logic seems to take one line, that we have no idea who input, off a printout as the gospel truth.
Regarding point 2, I have no idea what the other side looks like. That's why I'd like to see it. I expect, and hope, Rupp and Salazar to issue a detailed response to these items. If they only stick with a blanket, PR, word-smithed statement, they deserve to go down in flames. It is hard to disprove something, but there could be information presented that would help clarify something.
You seem to think I am unwilling to accept the truth, and I will admit to that fact, but by saying something "probably" means something and discounting any alternative, especially when you are not talking about an actual prescription or picture of a a product etc., to me doesn't leave any room for consideration of something alternative.
I do find it hard to believe that a high school runner that didn't even run full-time cross country his freshman year is using testosterone as a 16-year old. I certainly don't find it impossible to believe, but I don't see a problem waiting until we hear a more detailed response. If that never comes, I will jump ship too. I just don't see the disadvantage of waiting a week or two to see what else emerges.