Mr. Magoo wrote:
I have no impetus to go into detail for the benefit of, get this, a classic anonymous message board blowhard.
Assume for the record that I know the nephew of a guy whose babysitter dates one of the uncles of someone involved in the production of the BBC feature. That puts me right in the center of the action.
If you didn't think I could back up what I say, you wouldn't be hectoring me so vigorously. Clearly you want me to spill it. No need; anything I could tell you that is not presently for public consumption will unquestionably come out in the wash, and soon. So you can take solace in that much.
Wow....even more BS than I had imagined. You couldn't have confirmed my beliefs any better than you just did: you know nothing of substance, know no one of importance (in this story), are a nobody yourself (as relates to the sport), but DO have an incredibly inflated opinion of the random thoughts that bounce into your head.
I was not "hectoring (you) so vigorously" because I thought you knew anything worth "spill(ing)". Quite the opposite (which was probably clear to most)- I thought you knew nothing, wanted you to prove me right (as you did), but was giving a chance to make me look stupid by proving me wrong (and showing that you actually are someone with "inside info").
Oh well, no biggie, anonymous internet blowhards who pretend they are "right in the center of the action" on big stories are a dime a .....dozen million. You have a lot of company, so don't feel bad.
(now of course feel free to, at any time, prove me wrong, put me in my place, and slam your facts on the table: who are you, and how you know so much. No one is holding their breath though, so take your time)