Seriously? The burden is not on me to produce scientific data that EPO works just as well on 2:05 guys as it does on 2:10 guys; that is the baseline stipulation given what is known about the mechanism of action of EPO. The burden is on YOU to provide evidence that it does NOT work as well on the fastest of the fast (and even then, only Africans). You sound like the religious types who insist that until nonbelievers somehow prove that God doesn't exist, He obviously does.
1. No shit. This doesn't relate in any way to physiological resistance to effects of EPO.
2. What are you saying? That the increase in blood volume as a result of training (or heat acclimatization, and modulated chiefly by the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone axis) is not matched by a proportional increase in RBC volume? I've known this for 30 years.
3. See 1). And actually, this is as inane as it is off-point. You don't have to train in any particular or optimal way to see increases in plasma volume.
IT IS NOT CLEAR WHAT YOUR ALL-CAPS DECLARATION IS INTENDED TO CONVEY.
The rest of your post is the same old tired bullshit expressed in the same old tired way (e.g., Jeptoo got faster because her life improved; I know that the Ethioipians wouldn't dop because of their terrible fear of needles).
As for the idea that the entire running, skiing and cycling worlds are sold on a myth, and that the use of EPO persists because of the stubborn adherence of this myth: Please. There are some dumb shits rambling and raging about this forum, but don't be that patronizing, if that is even the word for it.