Rojo, for your article, stick to the incriminating evidence. Maybe in the end, summarize by issuing a challenge or that LR has offered $25K (are we up to that) if he can run 3:15.
Here are the incriminating facts, as I recall them. There are probably more.
1. No other finisher (total number?) in race with 0 pictures outside of finish line.
2. 1 in 11,000 chance of 0 photos based on statistical analysis of the number of photos of the 100 finishers nearest his 3:11 finish.
3. Bridge photographer at mile ?? has a consistent stream of photos with timestamps. MR does not pass by there at any point and there are no large time gaps in the photo stream during the time he would need to pass through to run between 3:00 and 3:30 pace. Unless he can run the 200m visibility of those pics in under 6 seconds, he was simply not there.
4. 3:11 is hugely inconsistent with past performances. Lots to elaborate on here.
5. 1000 miles in 18 months is not heavy milage and not consistent with a 3:11 marathoner, particularly a new runner who does not have years of miles of muscle memory in his legs
6. Inconsistent social media treatment of his breakout LV performance in comparison to his other races and training
7. Wet front of body yet dry armpits suggests lack of sweat but rather poured water on himself
8. Started with sunglasses and headphones. Finished without.
9. Will not produce GPS evidence that he claims to have of the LV performance and/or other workouts that are consistent with being able to run 3:15
10. Having never run more than 5K at 3:11 pace, it is illogical that he would attempt a marathon at that pace, particularly as only 3:25 needed for BQ
Obviously, write the article as you see fit, but I'd stick to simply presenting a strong case of the massively incriminating evidence.