rojo wrote:
Reg Fields wrote:21:46 is quite slow for a 3:11 marathoner. In fact is there any 3:11 marathoner who can't break 20, especially with 10K on the line?
Yes, but it's quite fast for Rossi. Rossi's pb was/is 21:52. So this would be a good result for him.... if it's legit.
He's never going to run 3:11. It's not physiologically possible for him. I mean come on but 3:25 is somewhat conceivable. Any PB by mike makes me 2% nervous I'll have to pay the cheater out.
I'm too lazy to go back, but didn't he a little while back only manage a slightly less than 24 minute 5k? If he didn't cheat, it's quite an improvement, but, it would also confirm that your money is safe. When people start training hard, they can make "big" improvements, but after the initial jump it gets harder and harder to drop time. If this is legit, then I'd guess he's made his jump, and now the real hard work starts. (Also, dropping from 24 to 22 is a lot easier than dropping from 22 to 20, especially for a guy pushing 50). He's got to lose almost two minutes at the hard end, and in a month? No chance. Well, if he's doping, but he'd need the good stuff, if he got his hands on some GW1516 and AICAR I'd give him a slim chance.
The sad thing, for him, is that it also just confirms he's a cheater and he can't actually brag about a new PB, because for a 3:11 marathoner, it's shite. If running three consecutive 7 minute miles is a PB? That's just telling the whole world that you could never have run a 3:11 marathon. A 21:46 5k is a tempo run, it's not race pace. No matter what he does, he just loses.