elephino wrote:
Nobody believe that any more now than they did the last 457 times you posted it.
Try to count that again. 4 or 5 or 7 times does not equal 457 times.
elephino wrote:
SmartRunnr is a liar. There were no new photos
What's your stake in this? Above you "just" exaggerated by a factor of 100, but here you are obviously lying, because you actively participated in the discussion of the photos here a couple of pages back. Why?
Yes I know, Derek or Michael or whoever it was tried to belittle the significance of some of these photos. But that didn't matter to the unbiased committee in its search for the truth. What was it again? Oh yeah, one allegedly didn't count, because it would imply a positive split, which in itself would be impossible (sic!); another didn't count, because Mike was in the shade, so hypothetically it might have somebody different with his clothes and height and gait, and the rest, well who really cares what lame excuses that troll came up with.
As for the committee, "There was NO meaningful investigation", seriously? You have all read so much about its thorough, lengthy investigation under inclusion of experts from the local running scene as well as USATF. For example in phillymag:
" "We reviewed every piece of data available to us and searched extensively for additional data like police surveillance video and media coverage," she says, adding that United States Track & Field — the national governing body for the sport — acted in an advisory capacity for the inquiry."
Sound thorough to me.
And in conclusion:
" In this process, we uncovered no evidence of wrongdoing on Mr. Rossi's part … The investigation is concluded. "
Again, "no evidence" is a very clear, strong statement, e.g. in contrast to "not enough evidence" or " only circumstantial evidence" etc. Some of you here act as if "no evidence" would equal "strong evidence", others even pretend that there was no investigation. Grow up and get a life. Or carry on with this wild goose chase/conspiracy theory, if you prefer.