Doubler wrote:
I agree 100% that the posts made against Ken's kid were worse than anything Ken posted.
However, here's the rub..
The post against Ken's son were made anonymously. He is stating as fact that it is Mike making those posts. We may all believe that..but right now we don't have the evidence.
IF Mike somehow can prove he DID NOT make those posts, that's another possible instance of defamation that Mike could pursue against Ken. For all we know it's a disgruntled ex customer of Ken's making posts. We may suspect it's Mike but we have no proof.
I appreciate the passion has for getting Mike DQ'd, but getting personal only sets back out cause and allows Mike to play the victim card. we know thats BS, but itngives him ammo.
The posts against Ken's son were made by Mike. There's no doubt about that.
He said "gimp kid" together with things about Ken only Mike could know.
Remember, Mike is the guy who made sexual comments about 10 years old daughters of some LRC members who identified themselves.