RosieRossi wrote:
Which easily explains VIA.
That said, they may know some of the same people where "Rossi" is a fairly common name. Yhy they don't give us the "evidence" is troubling, it's not like they have state secrets, which would be easier to attain.
Dude, do you listen to yourslf wrote:One good rule to live by is to never assume malice when incompetence will suffice.
Most likely, there is no "evidence". None at all.
VIA has none. It seems like it is a state secret to you because you assume they have some. They don't. They just don't want to bring attention to that fact, so they avoid the topic. Just think about it - if they had something, they could shut everybody up by sharing it. It would be much easier than dealing with harrassment on their FB page. So, why aren't they sharing it? Simply, they have nothing to share. (They just didn't do their job on the investigation - either ignored all the evidence proving he didn't run it, or don't have the gumption to DQ based on what they know.)
Mike Rossi has none either. No "pics", no "data", no witnesses, no nothing. He was lying/bluffing when he claimed he did (the "6 or 7 pics" showing him on the course) because it publicly helped him counter the allegations. What else is a liar to do when confronted but lie some more? And, VIA is so uninvolved, lazy, & half-assed in their non-"investigation" that they 1) never even heard him claim to have that evidence; so 2) never even thought to call his bluff. Who knows if they even contacted Rossi at all.
I'd guess 99% chance that explains it all.
Probably less than 1% chance that Rossi actually made up some fake evidence and gave it to VIA. Like I said before, if VIA had ANYTHING, it would make the most sense for them to at least mention it in order to shut up some of the people on FB.