Hisa Mike
Hisa Mike
He ate an Ewok wrote:
Ken is the Jar Jar Binks if this thread.
"Meesa mad at you Mike. Meesa gonna secret get you in trouble. Meesa no understand why meesa no finish wedding videos on time when meesa spend so little time posting on here. Meesa like running, it is fun to read about. Meesa say Hi Mike. So funny to meesa."
Oh FFS.
Kenny is clearly the Jabba the Hut of this thread.
5 is on Your Side wrote:
SaraB wrote:Anyone can join, as long as you have a friend in there to invite you. I don't accept friend requests from people with no name or where the account has just been created. I'm not in charge either, we're all equals and we're investigating any potential cheats, not just Rossi. :)
Meeting #2:
SaraB: "Everyone come to order. [bangs gavel] Anyone have any new cheaters to investigate?"
[Chorus of 'No's]
Tony Rigdon: "Hey guys, let's talk about Mike Rossi again."
Reg Fields: "Great idea! Let's do it!"
GregTR: "There's a 0.000002% chance that we'll ever discuss someone other than Mike Rossi."
SaraB: "So you're telling me there's a chance? Yes!!!!!
The fact is that the evidence collected to date is conclusive and easily crosses the threshold to DQ Rossi. Yes, the LVHN Committee and/or the Race Director willfully choose to ignore the evidence that was available. While we do not know exactly what was "reviewed, we do know that they only thing they considered was the "accuracy" of his time based on their statement.
Specifically, their only statement regarding evidence was "there is not conclusive evidence that his time in the 2014 LVHN Via Marathon is inaccurate." Well, duh, of course there was no conclusive evidence about his time because there were no timing mats. However, there was no mention about any photos or lack thereof or the review of any photos. Those time stamped photos and the lack of any for Mr. Rossi is as conclusive evidence that his time is inaccurate as any other evidence would provide. Not to even address the lack of photos is telling on several levels.
We also know that they did not contact or speak with any other race participants, especially the ones that finished close to him.
Most importantly, they made no positive attribution to Mr. Rossi - they did not say that his time was accurate (instead no evidence that it was inaccurate) and they did not say that he ran the entire race. Why not? Because if they had said either of those and were challenged, they knew that they could not provide any evidence to support that his time was accurate (lack of timing mats and lack of photographs) and no evidence to support that he ran the 26.2 miles. Instead, they issued their negative and supportable statement and took the easy way out.
While new evidence would be nice, I am convinced that any would help since we don't know what they consider evidence, if not the absence of even one-stamped photo is not evidence enough. What would they consider conclusive evidence? Therefore the next best thing is for those runners of the LVHNVia to push the issue, which is what I am working on by getting as many of the runners to collectively call for a thorough review, transparency/information and ultimately, a DQ. It is a slow process, but surely worth the effort.
Strike while wafle iron is hot wrote:
I think they would be interested - they have a history of exposing fraud douchebags.
Do you know anyone there, Kenny?
I don't think anybody looking into this would care if the press was involved. When the evidence is collected and organized I think the only person who is going to see it will be Barb McKeever.
And then you will be getting a phone call. And then BAA will be getting a phone call.
And you will be forgotten until the next cheater gets caught and then your name will be debated with Kip Litton as to who was the bigger douchebag.
And then you'll be forgotten again....
Then why are you dips**ts still holding meetings looking for new evidence?
So are you on Team Kenny or Team SaraB?
It's just getting so hard to keep all this straight in my mind.
Play the Chicken Dance!!!!
[quote]In other words.... wrote:
Then why are you dips**ts still holding meetings looking for new evidence?
[quote]
There were never any meetings. That is a troll having fun. Mainly just people sending out Facebook friend requests to speak to as many runners as possible. And following up with the website that have video footage and things like that.
You see, we suspected all along that the people on here claiming to reach out to people was Mike all along an then, of course, he wouldn't actually do anything and everyone just assumed it was legit. Now it actually is. When somebody has an idea of where new info might be found you can be assured that somebody is looking into it.
And with more people working on it it's not too much of hassle. So everyone is still spending quality time with their families. Except for Mike who is getting drunk at Phillies games and setting a good example for his kids.
I don't think looking for additional evidence is a bad thing, as any new evidence could only help, even if it is used to simply establish that the Committee didn't really do much of a review, such as contacting any of the Top 200 finishers.
However, it begs the question as why you would even care if concerned runners et al spend their time looking for additional evidence. It seems to me that you are more of DS than any one seeking and establish the truth.
LoserMikeRossi wrote:
bored troIIer wrote:How do you know if someone is registered and can they use your name.
If somebody's name is registered it can not be used by another person at all. It requires a password.
Somebody tried posting as my name by switching the lower case i in Mike with a lowercase l and it almost even fooled me at first glance. You gotta be on your guard.
usernames aren't case sensitive.
I am on Team Toyota. Seriously, I am on Team Integrity. While I consider myself more of an independent, I am aligned with SaraB, just because as facts guy myself, I relate to someone that does not go down absurd conspiracy theories route, feels the need to bully members or try to control what other's do, and I am vehemently against bringing someone's wife, kids, home life, or work into this forum where it clearly is inappropriate.
I am not sure who comprises Team Kenny, but Ken himself is poison for this forum and for any evidence collected by him or his team. I think Kenny's issues have been fairly well established pre-SaraB fallout, during SaraB fallout and subsequent to the SaraB fallout.
I'm on team "Mike Rossi is a cheating POS". Which is everyone's team. Most people agree right out that MIke Rossi is a cheatier, so they're with me. But, thankfully, Mike Rossi and his tool friends keep proving that Mike Rossi is a POS (independent of him being a cheater), so they are with me too.
It's great that everyone is going at it in their own way to show that Mike Rossi is a cheating POS, and that no matter what course we each take, it all comes back to that one unassailable fact - Mike Rossi is a cheating POS. I do want to specifically mention the hard work being put in by Mike and his trolls to emphasize that he is a POS - some of you focus too much on the cheating and so it's nice to be reminded that he is more than just a cheater - he is also a POS.
Can someone drop a Mike? Boom. That's some POS stuff. Keep up the good work everyone, and remember we all stand united on the main reason for this thread - remembering that Mike Rossi is a cheating POS!!!
+1
I have some go pro footage from September 14, 2014. To whom should it be sent? I mean who is the VIA marathon person to whom it should be sent? I am not interested in sending it to anyone on this thread or posting it.
To all you naysayers - we are seeking the TRUTH. And the TRUTH shall set us free!!!!!
May or may not make a differen wrote:
I have some go pro footage from September 14, 2014. To whom should it be sent? I mean who is the VIA marathon person to whom it should be sent? I am not interested in sending it to anyone on this thread or posting it.
I/we have heard that tune before. Mike like's to claim that he has photos that show him on the course, yet he too doesn't want to share them with anyone to show how wrong we are.
abingtonrunner2 wrote:
May or may not make a differen wrote:I have some go pro footage from September 14, 2014. To whom should it be sent? I mean who is the VIA marathon person to whom it should be sent? I am not interested in sending it to anyone on this thread or posting it.
I/we have heard that tune before. Mike like's to claim that he has photos that show him on the course, yet he too doesn't want to share them with anyone to show how wrong we are.
I am not saying what is or is not on the footage, not going to get into that. Assume it is nothing. I am not claiming it is anything even of interest. I am simply asking to whom it should be sent at VIA that would actually look at it. I am not going to post again. Not claiming a smoking gun or any mystery.
May or may not make a differen wrote:
I am not saying what is or is not on the footage, not going to get into that. Assume it is nothing. I am not claiming it is anything even of interest. I am simply asking to whom it should be sent at VIA that would actually look at it. I am not going to post again. Not claiming a smoking gun or any mystery.
If you want me to assume it is nothing, you should assume that VIA has absolutely no interest in looking at it.
You really think they want to watch everyone's home videos?
May or may not make a differen wrote:
abingtonrunner2 wrote:I/we have heard that tune before. Mike like's to claim that he has photos that show him on the course, yet he too doesn't want to share them with anyone to show how wrong we are.
I am not saying what is or is not on the footage, not going to get into that. Assume it is nothing. I am not claiming it is anything even of interest. I am simply asking to whom it should be sent at VIA that would actually look at it. I am not going to post again. Not claiming a smoking gun or any mystery.
Just link us to it or post it on the Via marathon FB page. It either stands up to scrutiny or it doesn't. This thread won't make or break evidence. All these messages that "I have X, but need to know where to send it so it doesn't get destroyed/picked a part by you guys" just makes you sound like a troll, or an idiot, or both.
just link it wrote:
May or may not make a differen wrote:I am not saying what is or is not on the footage, not going to get into that. Assume it is nothing. I am not claiming it is anything even of interest. I am simply asking to whom it should be sent at VIA that would actually look at it. I am not going to post again. Not claiming a smoking gun or any mystery.
Just link us to it or post it on the Via marathon FB page. It either stands up to scrutiny or it doesn't. This thread won't make or break evidence. All these messages that "I have X, but need to know where to send it so it doesn't get destroyed/picked a part by you guys" just makes you sound like a troll, or an idiot, or both.
+1