CSU-1959 wrote:
R U Cereal? wrote:Oh, I see now. Trying to make your accusers look so unintelligent that no one takes them seriously. Mike, I must say that is a very interesting strategy!
You say you know nothing about the guy.
You don't understand the obsession.
Do you not understand that he couldn't have run the race because there are no photos of him and his profile does not support a 3:11 performance? Have you read any of the previous posts? do you understand the argument? Why are you following along?
1) Yes, I do understand that he most likely cheated and his profile does not support a 3:11 performance. I never said otherwise. Are you having trouble understanding this?
2) Yes, I have read quite a few posts. Not all of them but quite a few. And yes, I do understand the arguments being made. Indeed, I agree with most of them. Are you having a difficult time understanding this?
3) Why am I following along? I saw a very active thread so I checked it out. Is that odd? I read through enough of it to get the gist. Does that seem difficult? I can see that Rossi is guilty as charged. Does that trouble you? I also see several here who are liars (much like Rossi himself). Are you unable to see this as well?