WAAA wrote:
Cemr wrote:Is anyone surprised that Mike Rossi did not delete more twitter followers given that the random sampling revealed that quite a few are nothing more than spam or dead accounts? Yeah, me neither. Since I am still among his loyal followers (that's right Mike, you didn't delete me, I am too close to you to suspect me to be a mole, hint), I will, if there is interest, post more suspect followers and maybe some of the followed. While some of you laugh at the spambots, I laughed harder that he, thereamikerossi, follows himself. Then again, he has been known to like his own tweets since no one else ever hits the like button.
If you are really a follower, what is Rossi's last Tweet?
#crickets
#troll
Why are you talking in the third person, again? If you are or you think you are Mike Rossi, why not grow up and say so? Are you that ashamed and embarrassed by what you created that you can't accept who you are and what has been memorialized on the Internet for eternity? If so, why should anyone here show you any respect if you don't respect yourself enough to say...."what is MY last tweet" or speak in the first person?
On the one hand I believe you to be Mike Rossi, on the other hand, I think Catch Me if U Can, who spoke in the first person and who, without saying he cheated, did acknowledge that he exploited VIA to his advantage, is Mike Rossi. It was a backhanded admission of sorts.
Either way, if you are Mike Rossi, I suggest rather than acting like a petulant eunuch and hiding behind WAAA and other screen names, that you instead at least speak as though you are him, in the first person. Otherwise, you are all talk and no action, but it is your reputation, or more accurately, Mike Rossi's.
Fondly,
C.E.R.