A usual, the ratio of useful information and reflection to nonsense makes it hard to figure out anything that is going on.
Here are some reflections from a "user": I have no idea what hyperthyroidism feels like, but it is hard to imagine it being a performance enhancer. On the other end of the scale, I can attest from my own experience that hypothyroidism interferes with all sorts of ordinary functioning, and so proper treatment does for sure "enhance" performance, if by that one means "returns one to a normal state of health by the diagnosis and treatment of a medical condition." I do not think there is a TSH 'sweet spot,' but -- following the understanding of my physician, the range of what is considered to be normal -- between hypo- and hyper- is rather wide, and so my physician, by a process of testing, of my taking medication, and of followup testing combined with my feedback to him, has made adjustments, trying to find the best dosage for me within the normal range. What he has said to me is, within the normal range, different patients report feeling best at different TSH test results. So, in these ways, I suppose I could be said to have been 'manipulating' thyroid medication for some years, in order to find the best outcome, for me.
This is all legal, in athletics terms, and is good medical practice, too.
As for Prozac or other SSRI's as something that enhances athletic performance, that is about as concentrated a bit of nonsense as one can find on these message boards. When I go back and read the interviews Salazar gave around 1994 (when he 'came back' and won Comrades), what was quoted and reported read to me like a person who had been very depressed since his elite athletics career had ended in 1984. He would not have been the first post-elite athlete to confront that problem. Perhaps Prozac helped him recover from that. If so, good for him. Such medications do help about half of those who take them. If such medications help a depressed person function, good for them -- they are fortunate. But such medications just as often have debilitating physical effects that are noticeable in athletic training.
In any case, those medications are legal, in athletics terms. The continuing attempt to suggest that such things constitute 'unethical' sporting practice, if not outright cheating, suggest more about those who continue to restate these things
As for all the other WADA-legal stuff that Salazar, or other coaches try out, so what? Training aids are either WADA-legal, or not. If they are legal, they are legal. I would expect a good coach -- especially one with a lot of $$ to spend -- to try out every legal thing that might help. This is not a 'grey area.' There are athletics-legal substances and strategies, and those that are not. Not hard to know which side of the line one is on.
I'm not interested in defending Salazar. Salazar seems like a rather dislikable person to me. Not that it matters to me, unless it is actually shown that he is actually cheating. But the things that are dragged out on here don't constitute cheating.