the grand inquisitor wrote:
coach B wrote:Word to the wise -- next time, think before you post.
Take your own advice. Everyone talking to you during the thread tried to point out that you were wrong, and it took you forever to realize it, and only people laid it out for you very clearly did you catch on that they were talking about a sub 4 mile, you know, because that's the historic mark.
For all your years, you haven't learned much.
A 3:42.54 1500m is not a sub 4 mile equivalent. Period.
EXACTLY