That said, what I don't get is why you feel the need to use words like "hag" and "leather faced" to describe, oh, everyone affiliated with the company, it seems. Really? Is being CEO or chair of the board a beauty contest? Does the CEO's appearance have anything to do with the quality of decision-making? Even if the CEO were a "hag" -- and she obviously is not -- what would that have to do with anything? Do you think Nike cares what Phil Knight (board chair) looks like these days?
I was going to post some of this hostility is from people are totally sexist. The language and hostility wouldn't be there if they were talking about a man. Same way people go after Mary W.
I didn't realize most of the posts are from the same person. hags central, I wear Asics, 2nd Thoughts, and Rothstein saddlebags are all the same ip address.
The "Karma's a b&$#^" tweet I don't really get. I must say the "team rivalries" do make the sport more interesting.