heyyo wrote:
Thank you. Everyone needs to stop acting like Farah being in the field is exogenous to the quality of the field (holding Mo's alleged manipulation of the field constant). Prior to any alleged manipulation the quality of the remaining field is already going to be decreased simply because his appearance fee eats a decent chunk of the budget. Outside of the Olympics and World Championship, this is expected to happen at every invitational meet. Therefore it should not be a surprise to see a A list athlete with a large appearance fee in a meet with other C and D List athletes who demand little to no appearance fees. Lastly, the meets may very well organize their budgets event by event, which means that having Farah in an event effectively wipes the budget for the entire event.
There's some truth to this, and its definitely insightful (and thanks for introducing me to the word exogenous) but its definitely not the full picture.
First, appearance fees are not dolled out in some scientific fashion based on your world ranking or personal record, they are more of a popularity contest. With that being the case, it is fairly inexpensive to build a field full of very fast but mostly unfamiliar African distance runners. In fact, some of the other British athletes in this 2 mile might actually be getting appearance fees that could get a 13 flat or better 5k runner to show up.
Second, budgets are definitely not organized by event. It is not uncommon for events to ebb and flow because other events got top billing based on athlete availability. If Mo was not doing this meet ... the 2 mile would not suddenly be filled with the best distance runners on the planet because the meet had extra money to spend on the event ... what would more likely happen is that the meet would use the money to get another global track star in any event they could.
That isn't to say that Mo's appearance fee doesn't dilute the meet or event ... the huge appearance fees certainly take their hit in the budget, which effects everything from the other appearance fees to travel stipends and prize money.
But there is definitely also a very real appeal as an athlete to go after low hanging fruit, and pressure on both the agent and on the races to produce that low hanging fruit.
So the easy money is good for the agent and the athlete, it is good for the meet (in the short term at least) because they got their guy, but its definitely bad for the sport.