"Deflategate" is essentially over after latest report

Or maybe the dumbas$ fans of the cheatingest franchise in professional sport are the ignorant ones, like parents of bad kids who at any opportunity, tell everyone how great their kids are.

get used to it.. wrote:

Or maybe the dumbas$ fans of the cheatingest franchise in professional sport are the ignorant ones, like parents of bad kids who at any opportunity, tell everyone how great their kids are.

Yet you can't produce one credible piece of evidence that the Patriots deliberately cheated in this instance? And why are the Patriots the cheatingest (not even a word) organization in professional sport? Have you done an exhaustive analysis of every professional sport? The Patriots cheat more than the UPS cycling team did? Because of what? Spygate? Please.

You come across as an ignorant hater.

get used to it.. wrote:

Or maybe the dumbas$ fans of the cheatingest franchise in professional sport are the ignorant ones, like parents of bad kids who at any opportunity, tell everyone how great their kids are.

1) Most people on this board know I'm a Cowboys fan, not a Pats fan. I don't have a dog in this fight.

2) I supposed you prove that no amount of explanation can appease ignorant, angry trolls.

3) I hate those parents too.

Extra points for saying "cheatingest franchise in professional sport" though, gave me a chuckle.

Freedom Trail wrote:

get used to it.. wrote:

Or maybe the dumbas$ fans of the cheatingest franchise in professional sport are the ignorant ones, like parents of bad kids who at any opportunity, tell everyone how great their kids are.

Yet you can't produce one credible piece of evidence that the Patriots deliberately cheated in this instance? And why are the Patriots the cheatingest (not even a word) organization in professional sport? Have you done an exhaustive analysis of every professional sport? The Patriots cheat more than the UPS cycling team did? Because of what? Spygate? Please.

You come across as an ignorant hater.

If the UPS had a cycling team they couldn't have cheated much because I've never heard of them.

It's not over until people stop making threads about it.

The USA cycling team isn't exactly a franchise. Do you have a problem with reading comprehension? Have you seen or heard of any other pro sports team get penalized by the league for cheating, let alone have another scandal like this under the same coach that was fined a half a million years ago for another cheating offense? Sounds like you are the ignorant one.

Freedom Trail wrote:

get used to it.. wrote:

Or maybe the dumbas$ fans of the cheatingest franchise in professional sport are the ignorant ones, like parents of bad kids who at any opportunity, tell everyone how great their kids are.

Yet you can't produce one credible piece of evidence that the Patriots deliberately cheated in this instance? And why are the Patriots the cheatingest (not even a word) organization in professional sport? Have you done an exhaustive analysis of every professional sport? The Patriots cheat more than the UPS cycling team did? Because of what? Spygate? Please.

You come across as an ignorant hater.

get used to it.. wrote:

The USA cycling team isn't exactly a franchise. Do you have a problem with reading comprehension? Have you seen or heard of any other pro sports team get penalized by the league for cheating, let alone have another scandal like this under the same coach that was fined a half a million years ago for another cheating offense? Sounds like you are the ignorant one.

Freedom Trail wrote:

Yet you can't produce one credible piece of evidence that the Patriots deliberately cheated in this instance? And why are the Patriots the cheatingest (not even a word) organization in professional sport? Have you done an exhaustive analysis of every professional sport? The Patriots cheat more than the UPS cycling team did? Because of what? Spygate? Please.

You come across as an ignorant hater.

Uh, for starters how about the team the Pats are playing the super bowl? Under Carroll, they lead the league in PED busts. I would certainly say PEDS make a bigger impact on the game than a psi in a football. Not to mention that same coach was forced out of USC for cheating.

Tip to the haters: stop bringing up spygate, by bringing it up you show that you have no idea what spygate actually was or what happened.

Ummm, dumbas $, it is more than safe to assume steroid usage across the league is equal and rampant. If spy gate were as much as a non issue as you claim, Coach Bill would be a half million richer than he is now.

Dial it up wrote:

All of this blew up due to Patriot haters who jumped on an opportunity to be ignorant. Maybe the discussion can move to the actual game now.

How is any of the response "ignorant"? 11 of the 12 balls the Patriots used were underinflated. It is a rule that balls are to be inflated to a certain PSI and the Patriots had balls that were not legal per the rules of the game.

Get used to it.. wrote:

Ummm, dumbas $, it is more than safe to assume steroid usage across the league is equal and rampant. If spy gate were as much as a non issue as you claim, Coach Bill would be a half million richer than he is now.

Dial it up wrote:

Uh, for starters how about the team the Pats are playing the super bowl? Under Carroll, they lead the league in PED busts. I would certainly say PEDS make a bigger impact on the game than a psi in a football. Not to mention that same coach was forced out of USC for cheating.

Tip to the haters: stop bringing up spygate, by bringing it up you show that you have no idea what spygate actually was or what happened.

Haha you are right, they secretly filmed in front of 80,000 people, they were the only ones who ever did it, and they got such a huge advantage that they have won 75% of their games since then(69% before).

You claim that actually being busted for steroids doesn't matter because everyone does it. But then claim that being busted for spygate means something despite everyone doing it. Hypocrisy if ive ever seen it.

Dennis Reynolds 2.5 wrote:

How is any of the response "ignorant"? 11 of the 12 balls the Patriots used were underinflated. It is a rule that balls are to be inflated to a certain PSI and the Patriots had balls that were not legal per the rules of the game.

You can't keep saying the same thing in hopes that it will eventually be true.

Even if 11 of 12 balls were underinflated, you (and no one) has been able to show that the Patriots had anything to do with the under inflation.

Dennis Reynolds 2.5 wrote:

Dial it up wrote:

All of this blew up due to Patriot haters who jumped on an opportunity to be ignorant. Maybe the discussion can move to the actual game now.

How is any of the response "ignorant"? 11 of the 12 balls the Patriots used were underinflated. It is a rule that balls are to be inflated to a certain PSI and the Patriots had balls that were not legal per the rules of the game.

I already explained how this entire process worked not only in this thread but in other threads throughout the past week. It is ignorant because people comment about "cheating" when they have no idea how the process works.

Is it cheating if a player flops in basketball? Or is it up to the official to regulate the game? It is up to the official to regulate the game. The Pats handed all 12 balls to the officials, and the officials deemed them legal. Thus, they are legal.

Who else is spying? This is an asinine claim. The claim about steroid use in pro football however, is not.

Are we to also assume that other teams are using underinflated balls too? Lol

Maybe the reason the Pats have won a lot of games is they always have one more cheat up their sleeve.

Now the big problem is the ball boy probably didn't wash his hands after using the restroom. 90 seconds wouldn't be enough time to pee and wash. Now that will need to be investigated. Wonder how long that will take.

Except the officials aren't the last ones who handled the balls before game time. Do you not know anything about this incident?

dial it up wrote:

Dennis Reynolds 2.5 wrote:

How is any of the response "ignorant"? 11 of the 12 balls the Patriots used were underinflated. It is a rule that balls are to be inflated to a certain PSI and the Patriots had balls that were not legal per the rules of the game.

I already explained how this entire process worked not only in this thread but in other threads throughout the past week. It is ignorant because people comment about "cheating" when they have no idea how the process works.

Is it cheating if a player flops in basketball? Or is it up to the official to regulate the game? It is up to the official to regulate the game. The Pats handed all 12 balls to the officials, and the officials deemed them legal. Thus, they are legal.

dial it up wrote:

Is it cheating if a player flops in basketball? Or is it up to the official to regulate the game? It is up to the official to regulate the game. The Pats handed all 12 balls to the officials, and the officials deemed them legal. Thus, they are legal.

If someone takes PEDs, competes and the tests come back negative is that legal?

Dennis Reynolds 2.5 wrote:

dial it up wrote:

Is it cheating if a player flops in basketball? Or is it up to the official to regulate the game? It is up to the official to regulate the game. The Pats handed all 12 balls to the officials, and the officials deemed them legal. Thus, they are legal.

If someone takes PEDs, competes and the tests come back negative is that legal?

Technically yes its legal because they competed without punishment. In terms of what actually happens, it isn't illegal if you don't get caught. Such as when holding doesn't get called. This may be a little over your head.

get used to it.. wrote:

Except the officials aren't the last ones who handled the balls before game time. Do you not know anything about this incident?

dial it up wrote:

I already explained how this entire process worked not only in this thread but in other threads throughout the past week. It is ignorant because people comment about "cheating" when they have no idea how the process works.

Is it cheating if a player flops in basketball? Or is it up to the official to regulate the game? It is up to the official to regulate the game. The Pats handed all 12 balls to the officials, and the officials deemed them legal. Thus, they are legal.

Do you know anything about the investigation? Not only do they have video, and over 40 interviews, the balls spent most of their time on the field for warm ups. One of the first things they ruled out was tampering after the check in with officials.

get used to it.. wrote:

Who else is spying? This is an asinine claim. The claim about steroid use in pro football however, is not.

Are we to also assume that other teams are using underinflated balls too? Lol

Maybe the reason the Pats have won a lot of games is they always have one more cheat up their sleeve.

I hope you are a troll being sarcastic. You do know it is common knowledge that all teams filmed right? Including coaches being open and honest about it. Look up one of the most prominent: Jimmy Johnson.

YES ALL OTHER TEAMS ALTER FOOTBALLS! Why do you think Peyton Manning fought so hard to get the rule changed so all QB's could bring their own footballs to the game based on how they like them? Why do you think NFL quarterbacks have come out and said yea no shit we make the footballs how we like them. Did you read the link about Aaron Rodgers that I posted in this thread? If you are a troll, get job, you got me. If not, may god have mercy on your soul.