True, but in this instance it didn't seem to be the way the poster described the men's group using it. He wrote:
"My teammates and I are constantly harassed by the group of men that train at the same time as our group on Tuesday nights. As they pass the yell "Track" or "Lane One!". We had a "Come to Jesus" meeting between our groups and their opinion was that we should stay in lane 1 but only in single file so they could pass. Our position is "as long as we are running a hard effort we're entitled to the first two lanes". We tend to run together as a tight pack."
I agree with everything you said except change "first 2 lanes" to "first lane". This group should respect that the other group who is trying to pass them is working hard doing intervals too and they shouldn't have to zig zag out to lane 3 to do it. And quite honestly, why the slower group is taking up 2 lanes is a mystery to me to begin with. If you're running hard intervals you should be on the rail running as little distance as possible and drafting off your teammates or running on their shoulder. It's not that hard when a another group comes up behind you to be courteous and move into single file in lane 1 for 2-seconds so they can pass. We had 100 people on our track team in college and both the men's and women's sprinters and distance runners managed to share a track without altercations just by following some simple rules.
If 10 distance runners are clogging up 2 lanes on an outdoor track is it fair to make the sprinters go out in lane 3 on their 200-400 repeats? No, it is not. So when people running faster came by, we moved into lane 1 single file. The same situation is being discussed here, except it's two groups at odds with one another rather than teammates trying to work together harmoniously to share a space.