He wants you to run like Henry Rono.
That is all.
He wants you to run like Henry Rono.
That is all.
And put down the bong.
Gary Oldman wrote:
He wants you to run like Henry Rono.
That is all.
Too young to understand that reference. 97' baby. Will check out mr. Rono.
[/quote]
And put down the bong.[/quote]
Brah, if you wanna me a better runner its about time you embrace the hippie shit. Have you ever heard of ultra running?
You can't "think" your way to better form, it has to come naturally. Short hill sprints are the best. When you relax and try to run fast, your body figures out how to do it more efficiently. When you go uphill, it puts a lot less stress on the joints than going fast on flat ground.
Form matters, but there is too much horseshit written about it to believe everything you read... Keep in mind that most people have no way of actually measuring which techniques are more "efficient."
random3 wrote:
Let me give you an easy example to think about.
A very good local HS runner that has above average form BUT he turns his left wrist 90 degrees on the backswing. This causes his entire hand to flop with every arm swing. It looks awful and wastes a small amount of energy.
This is something that would be easy to fix. Do you have him fix it? I would. However, his coach doesn't spend a minute on form. I believe he assumes, like most runners, that heavy training will guide him to the most efficient form. This kid is 60+ mpw and isn't going to change without thinking about it.
Btw, a specific answer to your question...unless your form is god-awful bad (in which case you should be listening to your coach) you won't be able to see and quantify changes without a high-speed video session.
Wrists should be slightly floppy, not rigid, that wastes energy. Think about when you throw a stone, your whole body uses a whiplash action to propel that object. Same applies in running. Think about it.
You got it bassackwards
Some of your training should be conscious efforts at optimizing form, and some of it should be incorporation what you have learned without thinking about it too much.
When you race, it is almost impossible to change your form and you must rely on what you have practised in training.
Yeah I'm from the school of thought of not messing with form at all. Studies have actually been conducted to demonstrate that athletes focusing on form improvement expend more energy than by just running naturally. If form changes do occur, they shouldn't require conscious thinking and should be the result of either increased flexibility, orthotics, or myofascial release. Anecdotally, I tried to change my form consciously in college and it 100% back fired. I ended up getting unnecessarily sore and ran like total crap.
HardLoper wrote:
You can't "think" your way to better form, it has to come naturally. Short hill sprints are the best. When you relax and try to run fast, your body figures out how to do it more efficiently. When you go uphill, it puts a lot less stress on the joints than going fast on flat ground.
Form matters, but there is too much horseshit written about it to believe everything you read... Keep in mind that most people have no way of actually measuring which techniques are more "efficient."
OK Canuck,
I'll start by saying that I agree with HardLoper (and your OP) 100%. I believe the form you're using now is most efficient for you, and probably, for a lot of chumps who do buy the 'long stride is better' or 'heel strike is better' BS. I also believe that the MB in general doesn't agree with me and most buy into the coach's spiel.
That having been said, the entire MB will be offended by my next point but you need to hear it. Will you heed my advice? No. Neither will HS poster jayz who will be pissed off that I'm throwing this out there, but hey, no one else is gonna tell you this.
The next step to getting better and being more successful is to ditch the coach. That's right, unload the coach, team, and school from your running career. This clown is only 'my coach' because you made him 'my coach'. You may think the school district gives the guy authority over anyone within the district boundaries. Not the case. At your age ran a lot, somewhat successfully, I might add, and never met my HS track coach. No cop ever tackled me and charged me with illegally training or racing without school sanction.
The school's sanction does not benefit you. It benefits them. Does it piss the school and coach off when the best distance runner who is elegible to be on the team runs on his own and wins races but not for their glory just his own? Yes it does. I know this from personal experience. I got to coach myself and do exactly what worked for me. I picked the events, never had to f-up a weekend running relay legs, never had to listen to the assistant football coach who needed a spring job and ended up with track blab about form.
Will you simply refuse to walk over to the track table next semester on sign-up day and run for only yourself? No. But now you can't say you didn't know it was an option!
Actually you should work on the drive from your ankle/forefoot/calf (semantics- we all know what he means) during TRAINING. Just like you run hills during training, intervals during training, etc. This will create the strength that you need during the races, when you should be running more on instinct and feel.
What times have you run?
HardLoper wrote:
Keep in mind that most people have no way of actually measuring which techniques are more "efficient."
It is called the power of vision and the stopwatch.
Also, there is nothing wrong with heel striking.[/quote]
This could not be more wrong. There's this thing called biomechanics, learn it before you give advice on LRC. It's pretty much imperative that you don't heel strike unless you wanna put a ceiling on your improvement. Running is all about efficiency, and if you're landing on your heel, its actually slowing you down by stopping your momentum. Mid-foot strike is the way to go because it adds to your momentum you already have going, using less energy. If that whole thing went over your head, then just take my word for it and practice running with good foot strike on your easy mileage and ask your coach about incorporating core and plyometric routines that will correct your foot strike.
Running economy is an outdated and oversimplified term now but otherwise your point is well taken.
Push back against the OCD thing and request clearly and politely that your coach leave your stride alone.
The confirmation here is the alter your stride camp has zero evidence, mindless analysis and often seems to forget HS runners are a work in progress with many important stride changes a functional of physical maturity, running experience and human evolutionary background.
I guess the OP is a 21 minute master runner who has read too many blogs about running technique.
knower of trolls wrote:
I guess the OP is a 21 minute master runner who has read too many blogs about running technique.
Not at all mate. Just a high schooler who likes to run and also wants to dispel the myths about drills, form focus, hours of tedious technique work etc. I'm a believer in minimalism.
It's an option, but in most cases it is a stupid one. Unless the coach is completely clueless, usually the athlete gets motivation from the teammates and atmosphere of being on a highschool team. Also, there are life lessons that can be learned from dealing with coaches, as dealing with a difficult coach can become similar to dealing with a difficult boss. In most cases, the athlete is able to train on their own plus with the team if they require supplementary training. The only time I'd recommend quitting the team if the coach is completely clueless and so are all the runners on the team. Then I would suggest finding a running club, as it's important to be around people who can push you and who you can be part of a team with.
its leg speed, or turnover that dictates speed, not stride length.
that research is solid,
drills are great, lifting is great, peripheral work is great, wrist flicks are ridiculous, and all of the chatter about leaving our team is hipster fol de rol.
slog miles at conversational pace, do sharp strides after your runs and run your short intervals like your balls have been scalded, and your long intervals at a reasonable facsimile of race specific pace.
go back and read the original works of arthur lydiard, he got it right.
egun wrote:
slog miles at conversational pace, do sharp strides after your runs and run your short intervals like your balls have been scalded, and your long intervals at a reasonable facsimile of race specific pace.
go back and read the original works of arthur lydiard, he got it right.
Your first part doesn't match the second part.
egun wrote:
its leg speed, or turnover that dictates speed, not stride length.
that research is solid,
Just think about the mathematics, and you will realize that speed is actually a function of stride length and turnover.
Here is a relevant article
http://www.scienceofrunning.com/2010/11/speed-stride-length-x-stride-frequency.htmlWith regards to the OP, Have you asked why he thinks that is important for you to do? It might be worth hearing his reasons for making that suggestion about your form.
Am I living in the twilight zone? The Boston Marathon weather was terrible!
Is there a rule against attaching a helium balloon to yourself while running a road race?
Matt Choi was drinking beer halfway through the Boston Marathon
Des Linden: "The entire sport" has changed since she first started running Boston.
How rare is it to run a sub 5 minute mile AND bench press 225?
2024 College Track & Field Open Coaching Positions Discussion
Move over Mark Coogan, Rojo and John Kellogg share their 3 favorite mile workouts