yes
something 46-high/47-flat for ovett but you are so fuuckin dumb to believe cram who ran 1'42/3'29/3'46 was vastly slower at 400 ???
no
ovett wouda aimed to peak for '80
'77 was just a move up to 1500 seriously as no chance caballo at 800, but he found all the oppo had basically died at 1500
bayi finished, & walker looked like a 5k runner on last lap v ovett
his wc win was impressive, maybe an intrinsic 1'43-low / 3'30/3'31 guy
no way much below 3'31 in '77
in '78 1'43-low / 3'29-low/mid
he was winning so much at 1500 back then i doubt he cared about '79 much other than keeping healthy for moscow next year
unfortunately for him, coe smashed lotta wrs & i doubt ovett was in shape to challenge albeit tied 1500wr
ovett got caught with his pants down in '79, short of huge wr busting shape of '78 & coe humilated his rep
12.3 is nonsense
ovett was hungover for 1500 & not that motivated
he'd got gold at his original event, so 1500 wouda been huge bonus
only a fool coud believe straub coud ever beat a 100% ovett ???
good for
~ 3'29-flat
a peak ovett, of fully motivated/sober couda definitely run close to this in '78 & even more likely in '80 when aiming for career peak
the only caveat is that ovett may have run himself into the ground in '77/'78 & after were past peak
i see '81 coe having fractional advantage over '78 ovett over 1500 but seeing as coe ran long way solo, he deserves nod
quit it
outta depth
i said mo was capable of 7'19 on his 3'28-day
rupp wouda been 7'20/7'21
utter clueless
henry wasn't 1/2-dead
he was 9/10-dead
he'd run criminal number of races by then, ~ 50 , so i doubt he coud even move much by then & had to jog most of it, but ovett limpetted him...
henry was quantum leap above ovett at 3k
drivel
8'13.5 with 1.08 is
7'36+
no
3 or 4s faster for
~ 7'32 / 7'33
henry ran his 7'32.1 in proper meet - oslo , off jog to 1500
he was worth 7'29 that night
ovett wouda had no chance if henry was in rested shape in that 2 miles
utter drivel
it was a synthetic track in '81
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8C5C1mIIJPMeven your peabain wouda comprehended that 17'54 was bogus
he won by 1s in a likely hugely wind-aided course
400 / 4 miles
of say, peak shape of 46.4 in '78 ->
46.4 / 17'54 ->
1'42.95
3'30.28
7'38.6
13'31.1
which is nonsense
coe was never in 1'42.9/3'30.3 shape in '78
the 1'42.9+ for '78 kills it dead instantly
cova was a nobody in '80
it was mickey-mouse race in '83 with hardly any history !
http://www.arrs.net/HP_Scarp8.htmovett crushed coe's '80 inugural win in '85 by 52s
20'07 v 20'59 !!!
coe wouda died if any pace below 7'40
ovett wouda impressed rupp with his doggedgness in his crushing
so probably woud yifter, who crushed ovett over 5k
yifter crushed him in '77
ovett had no interest in 5k unless african-absent
not on track race evidence
nonsense
see italian road race above
ovett was hugely faster over 7.5k
ovett's 20'07 over 7.5k in '85 shows such nonsense
it indicates ovett was in '85
~ 7'32+ / 12'59+ !!!
horwill talks utter drivel
the moron was bent on ratios same like canova who believes his kemboi in ~ 26'20 shape in '03 only ran it off 13'00+, when i told canova the 5k-zurich was jog to bell ???
it is shocking how fuuckin dumb horwill is/was & canova