random3 wrote:
Too true wrote:It is one thing to point out the behavior and let people judge whether it is appropriate. It is another to constantly whine - yes, that word again - about it for 22 pages. Like it has been said before - at this point you are starting to lose credibility by very obviously trying to keep this thread going. It is a non issue at this point. She did things well within her rights as a coach. Wah wah! Bye!
Of course, 1/2 of the 22 pages are posts like yours..."protesting too much" Shakespeare style.
Pretty much this.
Also, this whole notion of "losing credibility" makes no sense for several reasons.
Firstly, an argument stands on its merit. It is either valid or invalid. It doesn't matter how often it is repeated.
Just because you don't like what is being said, and because it has been repeated, does not mean it is any less valid.
Secondly, you and others (who are quite likely only a few people posting under many different names) keep repeating "you're losing credibility."
The only ones saying this are the ones who had their minds made up to begin with. The fact that "credibility" is "lost" with these people matters little.
Thirdly, no actual credibility is lost among the aforementioned party. This is just something the BAS supporters keep saying to silence the opposition without addressing their actual arguments.
They can't reasonably defend the actions of BAS, so they resort to characterizing the opposition bringing up what happened as "whining," have characterized them as "believing everyone gets a trophy", and as "losers," etc.
This is common behavior exhibited by people who don't take well to having their beliefs challenged. They get angry, don't listen to the arguments of the other side, and fail to articulate an actual point.
The best anyone has been able to do is say "BAS was within her rights as a coach to do this."
No one is saying that she isn't within her rights to do this. That is not what the argument is about.
People are attacking her behavior because what she did was cold, calculated, and repugnant. The fact that she was within her rights to do this does not negate the wrongness of her actions.
Something being legal =/= it being moral. Something being allowed =/= right.
Remember, slavery used to be legal. We would think people that defended owning slaves on the grounds of it being legal were in fact mistaken.
The point wasn't that it was legal to do, the point was that it is repugnant behavior.
BAS's behavior as a coach is the same. She is allowed to do what she did, but that does not make it right.
Somehow, this point has gone several meters above you and your sock puppets's collective heads.