Kimetto and Mutai are just on another level today, Kimetto just even more so
Official 2014 BMW Berlin Marathon Live Thread
Report Thread
-
-
God Mutai will most likely set his Legit PR faster than his 2:03:03 at boston
-
They've been slowing down according to the commentators. 40k split coming up
-
seems this race could use a painted tangent line like they have in the Olympics
-
She's here to run at least! No cute singlet stuff like w Kara.
Come on shalene.... -
Looks like Mutai might finally get under the world record, probably not quite under the conditions that he'd like though.
-
Different Mutai
-
Hingle McCringleberry wrote:
God Mutai will most likely set his Legit PR faster than his 2:03:03 at boston
Wrong Mutai.
that was Geoffrey, this is Emmanuel -
Projected times at 40k
Kimetto 2:02:53
Mutai 2:03:00
can mutai get 2nd and still be under 2:03? -
I hope Kimetto can hold it togther for a sub 2:03 finish. 3:00 last k.
-
douglas burke wrote:
Hingle McCringleberry wrote:
God Mutai will most likely set his Legit PR faster than his 2:03:03 at boston
Wrong Mutai.
that was Geoffrey, this is Emmanuel
woops sorry my bad just got excited and got my facts mixed up -
This is Emanuel Mutai not Geoffrey who ran 2:03:02 in Boston.
Hingle McCringleberry wrote:
God Mutai will most likely set his Legit PR faster than his 2:03:03 at boston -
Kimetto--strong form and interesting expression of utter zen-like focus. The mouth is interesting because it has the appearance of not passing all that much air. Perhaps the super efficient breathing is totally coordinated with his cadence...
-
Her 5k splits still very even, AR remains a possibility
-
40-41k in 2:56 he appears to be picking it up again
-
Not a fashion statement wrote:
She's here to run at least! No cute singlet stuff like w Kara.
Come on shalene....
SHE DID NOT GO FOR IT. She never had a chance. Reminds me of a HS kid that leads the first mile of the local 10k. -
Remember Douglas Wakihuru(sp?) , trained in Japan, with his zen approach to running?
-
KIMETTO 2:02:57!!!!!
-
gilt wrote:
5th place under 2:04?
Not even close. -
Now that was something.