bonehead meter redlined wrote:
"Many pros inject near-fatal amounts of pain killers so they can train until their limbs break."
-this has to be one of the most idiotic statements that I've read on this forum; and that is saying quite a bit.
No, it's a lot closer to the truth than you think. When doping was legal, the PED's of choice were amphetamines and opiates.
The late 50's and 60's saw a dramatic improvement in mid-distance and track distance times, achieved by a long succession of stars who had one or two years at the top before burning out for good. Even Michel Jazy's relatively long career was punctuated by two stellar seasons and sudden retirement. This is consistent with the effects of speed and opiates - highly effective as PED's, but also highly damaging and addictive so that in the long term they destroy athletic ability.
The IOC knew this and focused on those two classes of drugs when they started testing in 1968. They were motivated partly by the nascent drug war, but also by the occasional drug-related deaths of professional athletes. There were already a few athletes using steroids in '68, but the IOC didn't care, and they didn't care in '72 either. Steroids were neither as dangerous nor as effective.
This makes me wonder as far as gray-area PED's are concerned, why is everyone focusing on anabolics, thyroid meds or blood boosters? There could be some newfangled painkillers and stimulants out there too that the WADA "doesn't know about."