rojo wrote:
In 2012 before the Olympics, I asked about her on this thread -
http://www.letsrun.com/forum/flat_read.php?thread=4723880- and when it came out that her mom had run 3:54, I though to myself, "I hate to say it but doesn't that mean 100% her mom was a doper and she most likely is as well?"
Paula Radcliffe, 2:15 and 2:17 marathons.
Besides that, no woman has bettered 2:18 for a marathon.
Why not, "I hate to say it but doesn't that mean 100% that Paula Radliffe IS a doper", and that since you keep supporting her you're most likely dopers too, and that you sidestepping this issue keeps blowing any credibility that you have.
I'm just saying.... how about a few headlines with your suspicions of Radcliffe being doped.
What's good for the goose is good for the gander.