Conservative Panhandler wrote:
typical runner wrote:I think she has pretty much nothing interesting or unique to say.
Doesn't stop you or countless other idiots here from offering your ideas for consumption.
I'm assuming, based on both the demographics of Letsrun and your low intelligence when it comes to women and life in general, that you are a man, or at least male. I am also assuming you have no idea what it's like to be in the spotlight as a woman, an athlete and a person, and whether SFH chose that to some extent doesn't matter.
So you would be wise to at least recognize the frailty and dimness of your ideas, as free though you may be to shit 'em up shittily in this shittiest of shitholes.
I'm guessing YOU have zero intelligence when it comes to the way people are... or you're outright lying and secretly insecure. Fact is, this wishy washy happy stuff for SFH is complete b*llsh-t. SFH became a high-priced escort, basically a female mack. She knew how to manipulate men, and don't think she picked up those skills overnight in her mid-life, either. Her husband seems like a real pushover, so, sad to say, she was probably racking up experience and honing her skills since college.
Behind the scenes, things are pretty vicious when it comes to sex and status-seeking and social maneuvering, and that includes college kids and NCAA athletes. I have personal insight into this.
If some famous male distance runner started pimping other female distance runners, then wrote a book/made a movie about it, what would all you SFH defenders have to say about that?
It certainly is possible to be promiscuous without the manipulation, drama, viciousness, etc., but that is not how most people I know swing these days, and especially not the headcase D1 athletes at big schools.
But you are either blind to all of this or a partial participant in such greedy things and the SFH story has created cognitive dissonance in your life.