You listen, are you a total friggin idiot, his statement is 'anecdotal' ("feedback I've been getting"), suggest you look up the meaning of anecdotal.
If you want "evidence" from "other marathons or RDs" go and find it yourself as you have "primary" experience at "spearheading research". Otherwise, STFU.
A fool flatters himself, a wise man flatters the fool! E. Lytton
Let's look at some FACTS
1. DQd from RR100 after allegations and questions regarding splits were raised.
2. PM did not run the entire marathon on June 14th, for which an official chip time was entered. Instead, we are being told she ran it on some other day and just recorded the run for that day. This has not been disputed and to date, no explanation given as to why this inaccurate entry was made to the official results.
3. No less than 3 ACTUAL BADWATER participants from this years race have alleged that PM did not pass them on key points of the course.
4. No less than 2 ACTUAL BADWATER participants from this years race have alleged that PM left or traveled down the course in her crew vehicle.
5. At least 1 ACTUAL BADWATER participant from this years race have alleged they confronted PM about their concern she passed them unnoticed by them or their crew.
Question? If PM was DQd from RR100 2013 (which was reported to be on of the qualifying runs for her Badwater 2013 entry) would that not make her ineligible to have run Badwater 2013 and automatically result in a DQ? Granted, not an Olympic event, but if a runner is admitted to a race based on a qualifying run that was later ruled as a DQ, would it not result in them being DQd from that event as well?