Like I said same calendar year
Realism wrote:
a 4:02 equivalent from a year ago (and his best mile time this year being 4:13) does in no way suggest sub-4/4:01 shape. and it showed.
Like I said same calendar year
Realism wrote:
a 4:02 equivalent from a year ago (and his best mile time this year being 4:13) does in no way suggest sub-4/4:01 shape. and it showed.
Marcel Marseille wrote:
Like I said same calendar year
Realism wrote:a 4:02 equivalent from a year ago (and his best mile time this year being 4:13) does in no way suggest sub-4/4:01 shape. and it showed.
Yeah I misread it. Sorry about that. I still don't think it was wrong for him to be in the meet. He ran 1:51 and 8:46 this year, and the 8:46 was with splits of 4:30 4:16. Put together, his mile time should have been right around 4:00. He'll be running it a few more times this year, and I don't doubt that he'll prove that he can run fast.
And in any case, he's going to Oregon next year, so that might have helped him get in the meet.
Thank you for pointing that out - I had the same thought.
Yes he's either lying or his coach is a moron if he said that. This is his pinnacle race, if he was capable of sub 4 a few days after he wouldn't be too worried about states.