ecin wrote:
From the link above,
"Unfortunately, I do come from a family that has a history of heart disease, in particular, a higher than normal cholesterol level. It is simply in the gene pool. I only realized this about ten years ago and started taking a cholesterol lowering statin for it. However, I had a bad reaction to the statin (mainly muscle cramping) and as such got frustrated and stopped taking it for quite some time. I eventually experimented with different ones until I came up with the one that worked best."
Family history of heart disease is not necessary the equivalent of genetic abnormalities. In fact, that inherited risk may be epigenetic, i.e. accumulated poor lifestyles (in terms of nutrition), since, post Industrial revolution, a lot of family lines started consuming more meat, through greater standard of living and (urban) supply access, or, at any rate, less fresh produce.
For example, there have been some studies suggesting that, for instance, Jewish descendants whose ancestors faced and survived persecution in Eastern Europe have inherited negative epigenetic factors from the stressful circumstances of generations past.
I myself, as well as people I know, have such family history risks. It's important to know, of course, but the paradigm by a lot of the medical treating community seems flawed--a rigid "diagnoses" followed by statin drugs. I have a relative who works in the Pharmaceutical business--he's usually resistant to a lot of my harsh criticisms of existing social institutions and Big Pharma, but he himself opines, that statin drugs have a lot of dangers and basically generate profit through symptom treatment, and the approach has an unsound flavor.
Instead, there should be a massive systematic medical effort to really prevent and reduce heart disease risk. The idea that most people at risk for heart disease are just "genetic types" to which you just give a drug, I think is an incorrect idea. I think the modern epidemic of heart disease is not just a sudden appearance and matter of "genetic types," it's something more sinister about the way our Society runs and what we eat.
The emphasis should be on heavily encouraging lifestyles (not just exercise, but nutritional factors) that reduce heart disease risk.
Of course, this is easier said than done, and I myself don't always practice what I preach. Delicious animal products and indulgent foods are everywhere in our society--resisting them is not a simple matter.