Maybe the phones are very waterproof, and still have signal under a 100+' of water.
Maybe the phones are very waterproof, and still have signal under a 100+' of water.
The silenced transponder suggests a hijacking. That was the first thing the 9/11 guys did after gaining control of the cockpits. And the wildly off-course flight path also suggests hijacking.
Hijacking, suicide, whatever. In any case I'll stay far away from airlines from muslim countries.
Imagine you tell someone there are a couple of Iranians from Qatar who bought two plane tickets in Thailand via a friend who pays them cash through a fourth person. Then those two guys board a plane in Malaysia to China in the hopes to get to Amsterdam. From there, one of them wanted to go to Germany.
And now you say: this is not the main story.
This main story, as sad as it is, is so much more complex. Or maybe not.
They must have good hearing.
I asked my friend that is in flight school if there is anywhere in the world you could land and hide a jumbo jet, he said no, because the runway has to be about 2000m.
Then I heard about the North Korean option, or maybe some place remote in China.
My personal conspiracy theory, and it is 1/1000000, is that the jet landed in North Korea.
On Tomnod.com you can scour satellite imagery to help with the search
its hard to believe airlines are not tracked via radar for thier entire flight. Apparrently thier on thier own for much of a typical flight
radar wrote:
its hard to believe airlines are not tracked via radar for thier entire flight. Apparrently thier on thier own for much of a typical flight
This is what I don't get. How is this flight or any flight for that matter not tracked via radar? I googled this and apparently even the experts are stumped by that. Very unusual.
Planes can fly under radar.
"The ringing is not actually ringing at the other phone yet," industry analyst Jeff Kagan said. "It's just telling you that the network is in the process of finding and connecting to it."
Just a little food for thought so people's imaginations don't run wild
Cellphones kept ringing after Air France Flight 447. What does that indicate to you?(Hint: Phones will still "ring" even after the plan disintegrates.)
no tin foil here wrote:
The Mirror
Tina BurgessSan Diego Top News Examiner
Subscribe
Follow:
Advertisement
Malaysia Airlines: Passengers' cell phones ring, is China hiding the truth?
Zoom in
Share on Facebook
Share on Twitter
0
+
March 11, 2014
Malaysia Airlines is facing many mysteries and one of those mysteries is the fact that some of the passengers’ and crew members' cell phones are still ringing. “This could be a clue and shouldn’t be ignored,” said a man from Beijing surnamed Chen, whose cousin was on board Flight MH370, reported the MalayMailOnline on March 11, 2014.
On Sunday, more than a hundred family members of Flight MH370 passengers gathered in a Beijing hotel waiting for Chinese officials to provide answers about their loved ones. But when commercial director Hugh Dunleavy spoke in the afternoon, he had nothing.
“Stop hiding the truth from us!" shouted some of the people waiting anxiously to get some information, any information.
"They are not updating us that it is a possible hijacking," said a white-haired man who gave his name as Mr Li. His daughter was on board. "This means a greater chance that they are alive....
http://www.examiner.com/article/malaysia-airlines-passengers-cell-phones-ring-is-china-hiding-the-truth
runner who professes wrote:
The silenced transponder suggests a hijacking. That was the first thing the 9/11 guys did after gaining control of the cockpits. And the wildly off-course flight path also suggests hijacking.
Military now denies that they tracked the plane off course.
They have no idea.
http://www.cbc.ca/news/world/malaysia-airlines-flight-mh370-not-tracked-to-malacca-air-force-1.2567697Maybe the aircraft went through a worm hole into another dimension (parallel dimension) the passengers are still alive however in another world. Look at the Bermuda triangle where hundreds of ships and planes had once vanished with no sitn of them. With a vast amont of different nationalities on the flight I highly dought it was a terroisim act.
Many of the ships and planes that disappeared in the Bermuda Triangle have been found.
Radarman wrote:
radar wrote:its hard to believe airlines are not tracked via radar for thier entire flight. Apparrently thier on thier own for much of a typical flight
This is what I don't get. How is this flight or any flight for that matter not tracked via radar? I googled this and apparently even the experts are stumped by that. Very unusual.
Planes are tracked globally via their transponders. Transponders can be turned off or fail due to electrical / mechanical issues. Radars have limited range and I don't think anyone has built large enough radars yet to track airplanes over large bodies of water.
fgdfgfertrgsdagg wrote:
I asked my friend that is in flight school if there is anywhere in the world you could land and hide a jumbo jet, he said no, because the runway has to be about 2000m.
Then I heard about the North Korean option, or maybe some place remote in China.
My personal conspiracy theory, and it is 1/1000000, is that the jet landed in North Korea.
On Tomnod.com you can scour satellite imagery to help with the search
You can land and hide a jumbo jet anywhere in the ocean or in the jungles of Malaysia or Sumatra. It's just that no one is likely to survive the landing and it's very hard to find the wreckage. That's much more likely than a controlled landing at an airfield.
Correct. Fly London to NY and for a long part of the trip there will be no radar contact with the plane. Do people really not understand how radar works? It's not exactly cutting edge technology.
maybe just maybe wrote:
Radars have limited range and I don't think anyone has built large enough radars yet to track airplanes over large bodies of water.
Yeah except this plane was not supposedly far from land.