TrackCoach wrote:
Her coach did what a coach is supposed to do and that's file a protest ... 'the rules are the rules'
Exactly.
"The rules are the rules."
And here are the "rules":
The jury of appeal must uphold the decision of the referee unless the decision is found to be "clearly erroneous".
The Jury of Appeal shall, as its sole function in matters resulting from a Referee decision, determine if the decision of the Referee or the Chief Race Walking Judge is
based upon adequate evidence and within the scope of the authority given to such person.
If such determination is in doubt, the Jury of Appeal shall consult with all relevant persons and may consider other available evidence, including any available video evidence. The decision of the Referee or the Chief Race Walking Judge shall be upheld unless shown to be clearly erroneous.
The decision of the Jury of Appeal shall be final. There shall be no further right to appeal. The Jury of Appeal may, however, reconsider decisions if new conclusive
evidence is presented.
Was there "new conclusive evidence," that somehow only emerged once Salazar got the referee and company behind closed doors? Of course not.
So, "The decision of the Jury of Appeal shall be final. There shall be no further right to appeal."
I don't see anything in here about stomping your foot, yelling and calling your dad (Nike) until you get the result what you want.