RuKiddingMe!! wrote:
number one rule with women is...kiss and don't tell, I guess he forgot that rule.
Wrong rule #1 is FBGM
The Paris thing is retarded but I'm interested in reading the book to see exactly what the NIKE universe is all about.
RuKiddingMe!! wrote:
number one rule with women is...kiss and don't tell, I guess he forgot that rule.
Wrong rule #1 is FBGM
The Paris thing is retarded but I'm interested in reading the book to see exactly what the NIKE universe is all about.
Hey there Nick wrote:
These Symmonds threads always end up the same way. There is one poster under many different names posting how good looking Nick is or how he hooks up with so many women.
There are only two possibilities-it is either Nick himself posting or he has a very gay admirer because no straight male would ever give a flying f@$& about that.
It is probably Nick himself spamming the boards again.
What does it say about your own sexuality that the third option didn't even occur to you?
He spends a lot of his interview talking about the lawyers he had review the book with regard to future litigation.
In a year he will have his own "TMZ Track Club". SFH will be a laureate member.
Johnson City NAIA school wrote:
Is our head XC coach still Nick's agent?
Go Buffs!
Dennis Reynolds 2.0 wrote:
What the Heck wrote:2) You are clearly a moron if you are impressed by P.H.
I'm not impressed by Paris Hilton as a person at all but I know a nice piece of poon when I see it and won't turn it down.
You probably wouldn't get the chance.
http://gawker.com/5784564/paris-hilton-i-cant-stand-black-guysNothing. There only are two girls on LetsRun so the third option isn't logical anyway.Stats Manatee 006 wrote:
Hey there Nick wrote:These Symmonds threads always end up the same way. There is one poster under many different names posting how good looking Nick is or how he hooks up with so many women.
There are only two possibilities-it is either Nick himself posting or he has a very gay admirer because no straight male would ever give a flying f@$& about that.
It is probably Nick himself spamming the boards again.
What does it say about your own sexuality that the third option didn't even occur to you?
I remember back in the late 80's or early 90's being at the athletes party following the Vitalis meet at the Meadownlands in NJ and the pole vaulters were all laughing at the rookie vaulter on the tour. This blond just out of college vaulter had just won and was having a blast and all the vets were laughing saying how "oh well I guess he is the one". I asked what they where talking about and they explained that each year seems some of the black female sprinters picked out a young white new stud on the tour and would screw his brains out through the winter spring and summer at all the different meets the tour went to. They said you watch his performances will drop from here on out since his legs will be dead from all the "work" he now has to do.
Sure enough as I watched for results through the rest of the year the young blond stud's performances on the track dropped and by the end of the season looked a mess.
He would later get his act together and make a number of US teams and become one of the best in the world during his career.
HardLoper wrote:
Stats Manatee 006 wrote:Nothing. There only are two girls on LetsRun so the third option isn't logical anyway.What does it say about your own sexuality that the third option didn't even occur to you?
On his twitter acct. NS lists his PR guy Lifson. He's most likely the one planting the stories and stirring the pot.
I would expect this out of Barbara Walters (said she used to give oral to Sen.Brooke). Not a--sponsored-- professional athlete.
Would not be surprised if Nick or his PR person is posting on this thread. Seems like something Nick would do and a little free guerrilla marketing goes a long way.
No way I would actually want to read this attention whore's book but I am curious about the Nike relationship too. Lately, he and Fleshman make the sponsorship sound no better than indentured servitude.
Don't athletes get approached by Nike with a contract dictating their strict terms and the athlete signs understanding said terms and be willing to follow them?
If anything, shouldn't the athlete be upset with the agent for not negotiating well or misunderstanding the contract?
Ruddiger wrote:
Don't athletes get approached by Nike with a contract dictating their strict terms and the athlete signs understanding said terms and be willing to follow them?
If anything, shouldn't the athlete be upset with the agent for not negotiating well or misunderstanding the contract?
You'll Have to Read the Book to Find Out, Charlie Brown
Realism wrote:
ninja runner wrote:Paris is a skank, plenty of "normal" girls are way hotter.
Hottest girl I've been with was 19 or 20 when I met her, and now less than 5 years later she's a quite famous FHM/Maxim model. Met at a club leading to awesome night at my hotel, she said I was the third guy she'd been with, who knows if it was true lol. Anyway, we last chatted for a while on fb a few months ago, but I'm not interested in dating someone with that lifestyle even though she lives not too far away. Plenty of other girls way hotter than Paris, omg...
*man who frequents online distance running forum claims to have "taken home" a famous 19-20yo supermodel*
These two things are mutually exclusive?
That is news to me.
I've tried really hard to like Symmonds. In spite of my jealousies of his success and good looks, my contention has been that he's a good runner trying to popularize the sport so good for him he must be a good guy. Then he goes and writes a tell-all book. come on, what the f. His past gimmicks have been hard to overlook and this is the straw for me. Never have I seen someone enthusiastically exploit themselves personally with such enthusiasm. He's embracing every abhorrent method of sensational media available and he's doing so brazenly.Simply he's pathetic.
surnis wrote:
I've tried really hard to like Symmonds. In spite of my jealousies of his success and good looks, my contention has been that he's a good runner trying to popularize the sport so good for him he must be a good guy. Then he goes and writes a tell-all book. come on, what the f. His past gimmicks have been hard to overlook and this is the straw for me. Never have I seen someone enthusiastically exploit themselves personally with such enthusiasm. He's embracing every abhorrent method of sensational media available and he's doing so brazenly.Simply he's pathetic.
The OP or whoever wrote that quote gets a 10/10. He's still fooling idiots left and right. Astonishing display of trolling. Instant classic.
Yeah. Well I'm friends with Nick Symmonds, and he told me that he bangs the stuffing out of Megan Fox each and every day.
I'm sure the folks at Brooks are more than happy with this. On one side you have the Hansons and Ryan Vail which are class acts---and on the other Symmond's sharing his conquests like some high school jock.
but is the admin at Milligan - a Baptist college where NS's agent has a XC head coach gig - thrilled about all this?
Is erotic non-fiction by nick symmonds about Paris Hilton going to sell when there's a Paris Hilton sex video available for free?
Was reminded of Symmond's book the SFH book thread?
http://www.letsrun.com/forum/flat_read.php?thread=6811118
Did anyone read Symmonds book...did it sell more than 1000 copies?