Now you're going completely off track. Bad grammar, anger, insults, poor similes... they just don't (collectively) contribute to a good troll attempt. You come off as daft and unstable. You want to portray intelligence and stability if you're to have any credibility. Credit for trying to incite an argument - but it's a weak argument. See the problem with cycling's ridiculous classifications (aside from the hilarity that cyclists are so determined to establish a hierarchy via some arbitrary caste system)is that a very talented, inexperienced Cat2 cyclist can most definitely run, jump, skip, and throw faster than a current or ex pro cyclist right now. And with some background, said Cat2 can ultimately run marathons and pedal faster too. You're better than that. Rally. Build a better argument. Give some real evidence about how pro cyclists are superior endurance athletes and play on runners' insecurities. That's the path to a good troll. But I just can't improve your score yet. 2/10.
salid bar wrote:
Moron
Cat2 vs Pro is like comparing a paper boat to the titanic - they aren't even comparable.
4:21 mile having NEVER RAN BEFORE vs 26 mile race after casually taking up running after being a PRO CYCLIST FOR YEARS.
Are you really that dense? Some "Cat2" dad telling people he dropped a 4:20 having never ran before is not comparable to a PRO CYCLIST running a marathon with light training after years of being a PRO endurance athlete.
troll richter wrote:Nice attempt. But you kept the same name as your response to the Cat 2 guy post. You refute, then you support. Nah, man. 0/10.
And the fact that you're probably the Cat 2 guy poster as well, downgrade to 2/10 on that troll attempt as well.