It wasn't so much that he was a black man who killed a white woman, although that was certainly part of it. It's that he was one of the most famous black men in America--along with Michae Jackson, Michael Jordan, Bill Cosby, and Sidney Poitier--and he was arguably the most famous black commercial spokesman in America. He was also notably beloved by whites. He was married to a beautiful blonde and lived in the white community in L.A.
And then....The Beast leapt forth. (In mythological tems.) And incredibly bloody double murder. And all this a couple of years AFTER the whole L.A. Riots and Rodney King thing.
Court TV essentially happened as a result of the OJ case.
Mark Furman, the L.A. cop who had a hand in the evidentiary side of the case, lied on the stand or in a deposition about having used the N-word. Then they busted him in a high-visibility moment. Regardless of how strong the evidence was, that was all Johnny Cochrane needed. He was a brilliant courtroom lawyer--the whole "If it does not fit, you must acquit."
My sense is that almost everybody in the black community, deeo down, knew he'd done it. But they also felt that Cochrane and his team has bested Chris Darden and Marcia Clark--the prosecution team and that the case AS ACTUALLY MADE, in the courtroom and on the merits, deserved to go down, EVEN IF EVERYBODY KNEW THAT OJ HAD DONE IT.
And then something happened that simply never, ever happened. OJ was acquitted. He'd "beaten the system." Black men, as a group, never did that. Just the opposite: they got screwed by the system. For once, one had beaten the system.
It was that simple, in the end. What actually happened--that OJ had killed his ex-wife and an entirely innocent, uninvolved friend of hers--simply didn't matter, ethically, to the black community. This fact registered as sickened shock on the face of Ron Goldman's father when the verdict was delivered.
I watched a lot of the trial on Court TV. It was addictive.