WEBB IS BACK BABY!!!

I hate to say this, but maybe he is done.

Never gonna 13:15

3:59.99999 is close to 4 minutes but it is still a SUB 4

4:02.81 is SUB 4:03 which makes it 4:02. It's really not that hard to figure out.

All Webb would have to do is run another mile at the same pace and he would have the AMERICAN record. He's BACK!!!

4:02 is a solid opener for him. I'm guessing his 800 was run at goal mile pace- 3:50. I think he'll go sub 3:55 for sure indoors.

You heard it here first- 3:35 or faster outdoors. Staying healthy and patient is key. I'd love to see Webb serve golden boy Rupp.

WEBB'S BACK BABY!!!!

big case of numbnuts wrote:

3:59.99999 is close to 4 minutes but it is still a SUB 4

4:02.81 is SUB 4:03 which makes it 4:02. It's really not that hard to figure out.

All Webb would have to do is run another mile at the same pace and he would have the AMERICAN record. He's BACK!!!

It's not sub 4. At that level the timing system could be off by a big enough factor for the real time to be not sub 4. Also, at any rate, 3:59.98 is sub 4, but no one would disagree it's closer to 4. A casual observer would declare it near identical.

Trialswatcher wrote:

Some of you guys are challenged mentally for sure.

And 4:02.81 is closer to 4:03 than it is 4:02.00 it is not challenging math, it is really simple observation.

The number of people who care is closer to 0 than any other integer

big case of numbnuts wrote:

3:59.99999 is close to 4 minutes but it is still a SUB 4

No. 3:59.99999 = 4:00.00 as far as track and field times are concerned. It is not sub 4.

Neighbor ran a good for a fitness runner 3:44:56 marathon. When I referred to her casually as a 3:45 marathoner she got all up in my face about being a 3:44 marathoner. I don't think there is anything materially different between a 3:44 marathon, a 3:45 marathon and a 3;46 marathon. 3:43>47 even.At that pace you're pretty much running in a pack and things like optimizing tangents not slowing for water stops, being boxed in blah blah, you know the things runners and racers think about, are not in the mix.

Trialswatcher wrote:

It would be a good sign if it was 4:02, haha

It was 4:02.81, much closer to 4:03

I have no idea why folks insist on saying a time is 4:02 or a lower number when it is closer to the next second? Drives me nuts, a short drive by the way.

Joe Rosa who is hardly thought of as a a miler, beat him..Great race for Joe, really, a huge PR right out of the box and he was injured all cross.

LetsRun homepage says "Super Hot on LetsRun: WEBB IS BACK BABY!!!." The way it should be. That is just so heartwarming.

HammerFall wrote:

as far as track and field times are concerned. .

So like 7 people think it is a 4 minute mile and the rest of the world considers it a SUB 4 minute mile.

Saw both races and briefly talked to him after the 800 (very willing to chat, take pictures, etc. -- always nice). After mentioning a bit of a sore calf for the 800 (probably from the mile) he said "I feel healthy, just not fast". Seemed about right.

He looked to be working harder than the other people in the race, and seemed to lose a bit of form towards the end of the mile. Just looked like there wasn't another gear there where it should be.

just listened to his flotrack interview. He said he's doing a lot more cross training. It will be interesting to see if this will work.

Webb is awesome. Let's just hope he finally lives up to his talent. He ran 353 in HS off like 50-60 mpw, so he's basically the most talented male runner the USA ever got. And 31 is not too late to make use of that talent. Just look at Lagat still running well at his age.

I suppose it is possible that he is doing 5k/10k training, which would suggest 402 is about right.

If ritz or ryan hall ran 402 we'd be happy - 'hey, to do that on long distance training is awesome!'

but we have no idea what aw is doing.

nooope wrote:

big case of numbnuts wrote:

3:59.99999 is close to 4 minutes but it is still a SUB 4

4:02.81 is SUB 4:03 which makes it 4:02. It's really not that hard to figure out.

All Webb would have to do is run another mile at the same pace and he would have the AMERICAN record. He's BACK!!!

It's not sub 4. At that level the timing system could be off by a big enough factor for the real time to be not sub 4. Also, at any rate, 3:59.98 is sub 4, but no one would disagree it's closer to 4. A casual observer would declare it near identical.

I have an idea. Let's just call it a 4:02.81. If that doesn't suit you, 4:02 high.

You're delusional. The guy is washed up, he needs to stop embarrassing himself.

swerve wrote:

You're delusional. The guy is washed up, he needs to stop embarrassing himself.

No more 800s at least. That's where it really gets sad. He must think he still has that speed, but he doesn't

SO HYPED, WEBB WORLD RECORD 10K THIS YEAR. YOU HEARD IT HERE FIRST.

Guy is bald again - this tells me he is ready to be himself again. I admire his optimism or maybe he's just putting that face for the media.

Without his $$prime$$ sponsor now - how is he making ends meet? What does his wife do for a living?

In b4 anyone else and you heard it here 1st:

WEBB IS BACK BABYYYYY!!!!!