The debate is moot. At this time no one else wants to foot the bills. And as several others have pointed out, no one else provides as good of an experience or presentation for student-athletes and fans alike.
I agree with many of the knocks on Eugene, it's a pain to get to etc. But, you know, so is the Super Bowl for most people.
As for Alan Abrahamson, I don't think he truly used the term "ghetto" correctly. It is an embarrassing choice of words, perhaps an inappropriate and insulting one, or a flaccid attempt at sensationalism.
The terms "haven," "mecca," or "hotbed," are more appropriate, as running, jogging, track and field, and Nike all blossomed from Eugene (however the seeds may have originally arrived there.) And while none were wholly born in Eugene, they certainly did not begin there by being segregated off there ala a "ghetto." (The idea for what became Nike clicked in Phil Knight's head while he was in the MBA program at Stanford.)
So, running and track and field have not been segregated to Eugene, again, they blossomed from Eugene, as did Nike, and while Nike certainly has a financial investment in running, it also has running and track and field firmly in it's DNA and every reason in the world to finance and celebrate the sport it came from -- even if it might be losing money at it. (I would not be surprised if Nike technically lost money on track and field in the USA, but not on running itself).
It's easy for an Alan Abrahamson, a Rojo, or any idiot fan, to sit there with no economic responsibilities for those championships, i.e. reality, and jerk themselves into a fantasy sense of idealism.
As others have suggested, those other NCAA schools and cities have had their chances and nothing took root.
...This board has been dead for months, and I see this thread resurrection mostly as Rojo's attempt to stir up more traffic, after all, that's his job.
There is a much more important conversation to have on the current state of track and field in the USA -- and I am rather surprised that the thread on Nick Symmond's defection to Brooks didn't explode into that.
That in itself is a bad sign. The fact that a bunch of elites didn't jump on here anonymously and explode those threads -- tells me those elites have their heads in the sand.
Hopefully the TFAA will prove me wrong.