Lee Harvey Oswald: Innocent or Guilty?

This from Homer Henderson is all the proof I've ever needed.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l9jAGtfi8S4

Who knows.

You got the Mob, J. Edgard Hoover, The Soviets (I doubt it), Castro, Pissed off Cuban exiles, an so on.

I don't think Oswald was alone.

Here's a question, is there anybody alive who really knows what the bigger story is? What really happened? Maybe someone who is in their 80s. I wonder.

Wørd wrote:

Today, no prominent liberal would dream of driving through Dallas with the top down.

Keeping up on current events, no liberal in their right mind would dream of driving ANYWHERE in the USA with the top down. Way too many pissed off Americans right now.

Nailed it! wrote:

look at Bad Wigins theorizing about a conspiracy on a thread about conspiracy theories. LOL!!! LMAO!!! Ha ha ha!!!

Your demented sexual obsession with me is destroying your health. Get help, gay stalker.

LBJ Surhan wrote:

luv2run wrote:

Third shot strikes the head

from the front... period.

Watch the ENTIRE body move to the back and to the right.

Watch the latest NOVA episode...pretty compelling evidence about the "magic bullet" theory being correct and that the kill shot came from the rear.

Agree with some others here in that Oswald very likely was the lone shooter that day, but I suppose that we can never entirely rule out the possibility that he was acting on the behalf of others.

Shooter McGavin's Bro wrote:

LBJ Surhan wrote:

from the front... period.

Watch the ENTIRE body move to the back and to the right.

Watch the latest NOVA episode...pretty compelling evidence about the "magic bullet" theory being correct and that the kill shot came from the rear.

Agree with some others here in that Oswald very likely was the lone shooter that day, but I suppose that we can never entirely rule out the possibility that he was acting on the behalf of others.

Yeah, saw a program this week which used 3-D modeling of the Zapruder film to show the 1 shooter "theory" to be correct, and the only possibility.

Physics:

The body traveled to the back and to the left. Jackie climbed on to the trunk to grab his brains. The trunk was BEHIND them. An orange is an orange.

Certainly the official story of a lone gunman is nonsense.

LBJ Surhan wrote:

To everybody...

watch this at :56 and tell me that you honestly believe that the head shot came from behind.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eqzJQE8LYrQ

Watch that video in a slow motion, higher resolution version also on Youtube and it is OBVIOUS (IMO) that Jackie Kennedy holds JFK still, pulls out a gun and BANG!, JFK is history! She dumps the gun on the seat behind his back. The simplist solution that fits the facts is the BEST ONE!

OMG... you're so snarky and funny, and stuff!

Keepin it Real wrote:

Recent evidence suggests he is indeed innocent.

========================================================

Also shot a cop that day. Guilty twice.

luv2run wrote:

codger wrote:

Jack Ruby also had terminal cancer - the perfect assassin scenario........assassin of Oswald that is.

For a guy with terminal cancer in 1963 he held on for 9 years to die from a pulmonary embolism

So why wasn't he water-boarded?

Also, parade route was changed from straight-shot that Secret Service approved to route through Daley Plaza that included two slow turns.

Also, Governor Connelly objected to riding in same limo as JFK, but was shot down....apparently literally & figuratively.

Was the Dallas PD ever censured for not keeping LH Oswald alive?

Oswald always claimed he had nothing to do with it.

No actual proof he killed Officer JD Tippett.

Look before all you people ever make such comments you should have a WEEEEE LIIIITTTLLE BITTTTTT! of knowledge! The shot by Oswald was only 180 to like 265 FEET! Not YARDS....FEEEEETTTTT! FEET FEET FEET FEET! You and I could have stood at that distance with four golf balls in our hands...and whipped them at Kennedy's car and I'd bet we would have been dinging people in the head or dropping them down..a few inside the car. I could right now take that actual rifle, that scope and fire over and over and over hitting a target that size at that distance. The question would be how many boxes of ammo would I hit with before I finally was like 6" high on one. Plate size targets at like 265 YARDS are the question. The movement of the car etc meant nothing..not at 170 to 265 FEEEEETTTTTT! In fact in the 70's a good friend of mine owned the exact same rifle. At 500 yards he could hit a dinner plate over and over again. Heck our crappy 30.06's of the 70's could ding a plate over and over agin at 500 to 1000 YARDS YARDS YARDS! A sick scum monster with a rifle and scope at 174-260 feet...he could have told you if Kennedy had any grey hairs on the back of his head. It was a horrible day.

interesting! Considering that I grew up around 30-06's and many other rifles of similar type, could you make an entire body project in a backward fashion from firing a shot from behind?... I can tell you without hesitation that I couldn't... and I have fired thousands of 30-06 rounds in my life.

that shot came from behind

and LO acted alone

LBJ Surhan wrote:

interesting! Considering that I grew up around 30-06's and many other rifles of similar type, could you make an entire body project in a backward fashion from firing a shot from behind?... I can tell you without hesitation that I couldn't... and I have fired thousands of 30-06 rounds in my life.

It is always amazing to me that millions of people will believe theories that they have ZERO indepenant evidence of (Oswald did it, someone on the grassy knoll did it,etc.) and they won't believe what is right in front of their own eyes (Jackie did it!).

uh huh, because when a person on your left shoots you in the head, your head and body fly's backwards and towards the said shooter. You're quite bright!

Watch the Nova episode...very compelling case for LHO being the lone shooter.

Leon Trollsky wrote:

uh huh, because when a person on your left shoots you in the head, your head and body fly's backwards and towards the said shooter. You're quite bright!

actually it would

unfortunately most conspiracy theorists are not dedicated enough to submit themselves for the test