Although I totally agree with both articles on the dumbing down of competitive running in the US, I disagree with Reavis on why. He states that today's runners have a very competitive life as an excuse for not trying. That's complete BS. How about taking a look at the economy of 1980 and the number of sub 2:20 finishers in the OT marathon (I don't have the numbers, but I think it was about 60). It was also a bad recession with 10% unemployment. Yet, thousands of athletes ran their hearts out then. You had thousands of runners strivinig to go under 2:50 to get into Boston and had to run about 2:40 to get in the top 200 at Boston. There is a much better correlation with the advent of "for profit" races and slower times. As a consequence, they dumb down races to make a profit. It's been going on big time for the past 10-15 years. I have been actively involved in races for more than three decades, and I cannot relate one bit to today's modern jogger. My dad quit smoking after more than 30 years and joined the running boom in the late 1970's. Within 3 years, he just missed qualifying for Boston (I think it was about 3:25 for his age group) when it was much tougher standard to get in. He would kick most of today's joggers butt in a marathon.