Oh Snap!
Oh Snap!
Poor Igy's only defense is to project his illusions onto others. Sad.
Gruntz only defense is to use the word "sad." Most often expression of sorrow by the troll. Enough to make one breakdown and cry. Sad.
Oh so sorry. Oh snap!
Ghost of Igloi wrote:
mellon wrote:Your not reading my post dummy.
Read it again!!!! I didn't say you told anybody to get out of the market.
I said taking your advice based on Comment, charts, graphs, articles.
They have all been garbage as they relate to what the market has done up to today.
OK then here is a chart just for you. Smoke some dope while you stare at the ouija board.
https://mobile.twitter.com/hussmanjp/status/875716063379554304/photo/1Igy
mellon,
I thought the chart might be a little hard on the eyes. So perhaps you will enjoy this video more.
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-06-16/lvmh-ceo-warns-economic-crisis-unavoidableHave a groovy weekend.
Igy
^ Web site of an inside trader kicked out of his investment firm. ^
No one should be surprised by any of this. Igy is a Trump fanboy and strives to be like his hero...deceitful, narcissistic, and dishonest.
Reach for the Paxil Trews and don't obsess too much about your foreskin.
Igy, why are you so obsessed with my privates? I heard you came out, but I'm not into that.
Earnings Scorecard: As of Friday (with 2 companies in the S&P 500 reporting actual results for Q2 2017), 1 S&P 500 company has beat the mean EPS estimate and 1 S&P 500 company has beat the mean sales estimate.
Q1 earnings were impressive. It looks like Q2 will be also.
Investment Advisor wrote:
Q1 earnings were impressive. It looks like Q2 will be also.
Very impressive Mr. Invesment Advisor, same level as 6/30/2014 when the S&P 500 traded at 1,972.
ðŸ’
I do pick my nose. So do you, Igy. The difference is I'm man enough to admit it.
👃ðŸ½
ðŸ’
Thanks for agreeing with me.
Ghost of Igloi wrote:
Investment Advisor wrote:Q1 earnings were impressive. It looks like Q2 will be also.
Very impressive Mr. Invesment Advisor, same level as 6/30/2014 when the S&P 500 traded at 1,972.
That's more support for the "valuations don't negatively affect prices" argument.
Investment Advisor wrote:
Ghost of Igloi wrote:Very impressive Mr. Invesment Advisor, same level as 6/30/2014 when the S&P 500 traded at 1,972.
That's more support for the "valuations don't negatively affect prices" argument.
Which is an argument not supported by 130 years of market history. A competent investment advisor would consider that argument ignorant.
Ghost of Igloi wrote:
Investment Advisor wrote:That's more support for the "valuations don't negatively affect prices" argument.
Which is an argument not supported by 130 years of market history. A competent investment advisor would consider that argument ignorant.
Well it is an argument that was supported by you on the Roth thread.
It is only supported by your twisted logic of what I said anywhere on LRC.