Let me give an example of proper usage.
Agip has been proved to be a liar.
Agip is a proven liar.
Let me give an example of proper usage.
Agip has been proved to be a liar.
Agip is a proven liar.
Anti-Semite detector wrote:
[quote]K5 wrote:
The facts don't support your assertions.
I made no assertion.
Let me make one for you.
It would appear this genius does not understand the meaning of the word assertion.
Anti-Semite detector wrote:
[quote]K5 wrote:
The facts don't support your assertions.
I made no assertion.
K5 wrote:
@ 25% of undergrads at Harvard are Jewish.
So overnight the numbers drop from 50% (per your earlier post)
Here is another assertion.
Anti cannot read.
Per agip yesterday at 1:51 PM
"and I waste way, way too much time on this website. I'm checking out for a while - this is ridiculous."
Five hours later:
jfc I just had an epiphany -
Klondike actually enjoys the abuse - he is a masochist, lapping it up.
Now I understand his motivation - he needs the attention we give him, even if it is negative, so he feeds us his gutter spewage, counting on us to hate on him.
He gets off on it. He probably doesn't have anyone else to pay attention to him, so he needs us.
Ach, what a pity.
So much for agip's promised self exile.
This guy is pathetic. He should be in Israel stealing Palestinian land and water while crying he is a victim -- you know, just like his heroes.
[quote]Engrishman wrote:
Perhaps not lightly, but certainly incorrectly. The correct usage is 'have been proven'.
As has been sufficiently demonstrated the proper word was proved, not proven.
The word in question is usage in place of use.
Can you defend your usage of the word usage instead of using the word use?
K5 wrote:
It would appear this genius does not understand the meaning of the word assertion.
It would appear you are wrong.
agip said:
Klondike actually enjoys the abuse - he is a masochist, lapping it up.
He earlier stated:
and I went to an Ivy
and I have an MBA
and I waste way, way too much time on this website. I'm checking out for a while - this is ridiculous."
It would appear he is the glutton for abuse. At least if you consider this earlier meltdown he experienced.
Or maybe it was an actual epiphany. Unlike his "epiphany" that I enjoy the abuse -- which is actually self delusion on his part, necessary to avoid the complete destruction of his sense of worth.
I think when I called him on his actually using the "word" refutating something in him snapped.
Got to leave for a day or so.
Give it your best my less than worthy opponents
K5 wrote:
Give it your best my less than worthy opponents
You haven't exactly covered yourself with intellectual glory on this thread.
I've done my best which is more than good enough against the Kosher Nostra here. There are a few others who are worthy debaters and one fellow who is clearly a superior intellect.
K5 wrote:
I've done my best which is more than good enough against the Kosher Nostra here. There are a few others who are worthy debaters and one fellow who is clearly a superior intellect.
Ignore the fake K5. He is attempting to ruin my brand. I will see him in court. You can tell by his awkward writing style and lack of ingenuity that he is an imposter.
So K5 is not Klondike5? I'm confused.
Klondike5 is Jew hater and investment neophyte who started this thread. I am his doppelgänger.
Which one doesn't like agip?
Curiouser wrote:
So K5 is not Klondike5? I'm confused.
I am usually Klondike5. Sometimes K5.
My less than worthy adversaries, unable to support their attacks on me when challenged, often resort to the only tactic left to them. They assume one of my names in an transparent attempt to discredit me.
Not very clever boys.
How many names do you have?
Curiouser wrote:
How many names do you have?
That's classified.
Ok, I guess. Well then maybe you can tell us why you don't stick to one name.
Curiouser wrote:
Ok, I guess. Well then maybe you can tell us why you don't stick to one name.
Are you so ignorant that you cannot ascertain the obvious? Look up 'deception' and 'volume', then get back to me.
Klondike5 wrote:
The market has dropped materially in the past two weeks so any new money that went in 2 weeks ago is in worse shape than the money that was in three months ago.
That was true when you wrote it, but it's not any more. As I said before, it's all relative.
Curiouser wrote:
Ok, I guess. Well then maybe you can tell us why you don't stick to one name.
Don't reply to the fake Klondike5.
I recently switched to K5 from Klondike5.
So I am K5 -- or Klondike5 if you're not into that whole brevity thing