agip wrote:
short selling is hard to regulate...
the problem of naked shorting is hard to stamp out, last time I paid any attention to the problem.
and pump and dumps are always fodder for regulators.
not sure what the rules are on a bunch of people getting together and trying to squeeze a name. Doesn't sound right but I'm not sure what the rules are.
Bear with me, I'm writing this after 2 glasses of Tawney Port. Come home late this afternoon after brisk 7 mile walk, wife starts asking me, "whats all this $hit about Gamestop", after about 10 minutes of trying to explain, she says "forget about it"
First from Diogenes @WallStCynic aka James Chanos.
"Am still amazed that traders, both amateur and professional, do not comprehend that every share sold short creates an additional share “long” in the float. And that shares can be lent multiple times if the buyers hold them in margin accounts. Back Office 101."
"Say a company has 100 shares outstanding, but short interest is reported to be 150%(!)of the outstanding. On the brokers’ books there will be 250 shares long, and 150 shares short. The net amount (250-150) will always equal the actual shares outstanding."
"Please note that in this example, the short position is actually only 60% of the tradable float (150/250), not 150% (150/100). It’s also why high-short interest stocks are pretty liquid. A larger tradable float."
Also realize, in regards to Regulation SHO, MMs are exempt from naked short interest rule.
Implications, read this. ( I will get back to Squeezemetrics later )
https://squeezemetrics.com/monitor/download/pdf/short_is_long.pdf?
So what does this have to do with GME and Melvin Capital? Well when M.C.'s 13f was reported for 3Q 2020 it showed
Melvin’s most recent filing showed that it held 5.4 million puts on GameStop, valued at more than $55 million — an increase of 58 percent during the third quarter. ( also large # of puts on BBBY, LQND, FIZZ )
When M.C. bought those puts MMs would delta hedge by shorting these stocks. WSB knew if they could push shares higher by buying calls; 1st MMs will delta hedge by BUYING SHARES. 2nd, hopefully this would push underlying higher and as M.C.'s puts moved further OTM the MM's would reduce hedges by BUYING BACK SHARES, a virtuous cycle. M.C. countered by shorting and trying to pin underlying closer to ITM and making MMs short more shares reversing the cycle. They obviously lost, but in no way were they shorting GME at $4 or where short over 100% of float.
Now back to MMs naked short selling. Ever notice how a stock opens high and drops a couple of handles 15 minutes later ? Esp a stock that had some positive news report. Everyone wants in, who the hell would want to sell. Well, the MMs ( specialist NYSE ) has to make a market, so they push opening high , short, than buy back at the lower price. A constant money maker back in the 90s. Day before Dell's earnings, MMs would try to push price lower making current holders think someone knew bad news was coming, you buy. Next AM, DELL beats whisper # ( Dell knew how to play the earnings game ). Stock opens $10 higher, you sell at opening, always seemed to be the high of the day. Oct 1998, those bought at opening had to wait 6 weeks ( Russian default, LTCM ) to recover.
Back to Squeeze, hit 6 month and GEX. This and VIX Backwardation, not looking good
https://squeezemetrics.com/monitor/dix?
Read this.
https://squeezemetrics.com/download/The_Implied_Order_Book.pdfNite all, good luck.