agip wrote:
la gente esta muy loca wrote:
Seattle prattle is right. AAPL was a 10 bagger from Dec 1998 to Mar 2000, it then proceeded to drop 80% by the end of the year.
I'm talking whether apple had a low valuation, not its performance in the 90s.
have to define times to talk about apple's valuation.
Through most of the 90s its PE was around 15, because Apple was considered a hardware company that would eventually disappear. It was never really a high-PE dot com stock.
The Ipod didn't come out until 2003 - until then it was a niche computer maker.
here's a chart...you can see Apple's PE was in the teens most of the time, as late as 2012. Scroll down a bit to see it.
https://www.thefrugalprof.com/apple-the-valuation-debate/
Again, no. Apple was never a value stock. If its p/e was in the 15s in the '90s, that was about the average for the S&P 500 during the 90's which largely ranged from about 15 to 25. So it was right in line with that index.
The iMac laptop was released in 1998 and would go on to be tremendously successful. The first ipod came out in Nov. 2001. The Apple store opened back then too, but can't remember the date, as did iTunes. ANd being there in those years, Apple was known as a very elegant alternative operating system to the relatively crude Dos Microsoft system. And at about that time (1997), Microsoft announced that they would be partnering with Apple in several capacities, including financially.
Yes, Apple was seen as struggling esp. in the '90s as Steve Jobs came back to rescue the company, but so were the likes of Amazon and Google. And that is precisely my point, These companies were never seen as value plays and have always been painted as over-valued growth plays.
Now, Apple is and has been lower in p/e than their FAANG counterparts, but not so much as to throw it into a value play. It was the same back then as we hear now - grossly overvalued, but look where it turned out. And this is relevant to Igy's remark about the index because Apple and FAANG are a major reason that the index has the high valuation that it does.