wrong again B wrote:
Good 4 U wrote:
I wasn’t replying to you. Try to keep up.
Yet you did. May have to resurrect the smear "birdbrain" for someone as stupid as you.
Do you have anything to offer other than insults?
wrong again B wrote:
Good 4 U wrote:
I wasn’t replying to you. Try to keep up.
Yet you did. May have to resurrect the smear "birdbrain" for someone as stupid as you.
Do you have anything to offer other than insults?
Gruntz wrote:
Ghost of Igloi wrote:
Still to be determined just like S&P 500 trading 2,850-3,250 in 2019.
Exactly. And usually wrong. Right, Igy?
Not really, you and your buddys have been burned on the “buy on the dip” meme all year. Soon the market will be back to the level when I first posted here.
Buying low is not a strategy that typically leads to getting burned.
https://www.cnbc.com/2018/11/19/this-chart-is-proof-buy-the-dip-is-dead.htmlLittle Queenie wrote:
Buying low is not a strategy that typically leads to getting burned.
LOL. I wasn’t referring to day trading.
Little Queenie wrote:
LOL. I wasn’t referring to day trading.
OK, wiping out the “buy and hold” meme will just take a little longer.
Meme?
Helloooooo? wrote:
Meme?
Igy’s almost 70. I think we can cut him some slack on this one.
buy and hold certainly has been a meme since the tech bubble, and a poor one at that
Igy, you obviously don’t know what a meme is.
u obviously don’t know me
Oh, the irony!
Ghost of Igloi wrote:
https://mobile.twitter.com/MoneyPagesCa/status/1076885195922362373
But markets always do bounce back.
Yes, the NASDAQ Composite peaked in 2000 regaining in new high over 16 years later.
Ghost of Igloi wrote:
Yes, the NASDAQ Composite peaked in 2000 regaining in new high over 16 years later.
Yes! And that’s one of the slowest recoveries. Most happen much sooner.
Not different this time wrote:
Ghost of Igloi wrote:
Yes, the NASDAQ Composite peaked in 2000 regaining in new high over 16 years later.
Yes! And that’s one of the slowest recoveries. Most happen much sooner.
Yes you are correct, it only took the S&P 500 thirteen years to regain a new high.
dyjuytj wrote:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=91&v=OoU8XJmxCwc
Like eating CHK at $6.05 or AMZN at $1,005.
Ghost of Igloi wrote:
dyjuytj wrote:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=91&v=OoU8XJmxCwcLike eating CHK at $6.05 or AMZN at $1,005.
My bad, or AMZN at $2,005.