POD
K5 wrote:
A 10% increase over six months is "massive' but a 7% drop in two weeks is not major.
POD
K5 wrote:
A 10% increase over six months is "massive' but a 7% drop in two weeks is not major.
That's a hell of a lot bolder, and more specific that most any market pundit will provide. Or most anybody around here.
Sally Vixxxens wrote:K5 wrote:This year, huh? Thanks for your bold prediction.Sally Vixxxens wrote:I suspect you will all be sh*tting your pants this week-end.K5 wrote:Ya think? Not really going out on a limb there, K5. Major corrections are routine. If you really want to impress us, tell us WHEN.
Well one is coming that you will be hard pressed to deny is quite major.
It is coming this year, that's for sure
(P.S. That was sarcasm.)
I'm not that stupid to try to predict the market.
ummm. wrote:Sally Vixxxens wrote:That's a hell of a lot bolder, and more specific that most any market pundit will provide. Or most anybody around here.K5 wrote:This year, huh? Thanks for your bold prediction.Sally Vixxxens wrote:I suspect you will all be sh*tting your pants this week-end.K5 wrote:Ya think? Not really going out on a limb there, K5. Major corrections are routine. If you really want to impress us, tell us WHEN.
Well one is coming that you will be hard pressed to deny is quite major.
It is coming this year, that's for sure
(P.S. That was sarcasm.)
Do you want to set a better example and make a bolder prediction, more timely prediction so we can all take note?
Yup.
K5 wrote:
I'm not that stupid to try to predict the market
Yet you put your money in it?
Agreed
Ryan Foreman wrote:
As far as I can tell this thread bottomed out at least 1500 posts ago.
If the powers that be don't delete this thread I may have to threaten you with Ralph Nader or Ron Paul references.
a 4% return for 5 mos. is pretty good but a 7% drop in 2 weeks is nothing? You see no problem with this logic
Randy Oldman wrote:
The Dow is still 4.5% above it's closing price on August 27th and September 18th.
That's a pretty good return in 5 months.
is that supposed to be insightful? Clever?
Ryan Foreman wrote:
As far as I can tell this thread bottomed out at least 1500 posts ago.
If the powers that be don't delete this thread I may have to threaten you with Ralph Nader or Ron Paul references.
Clearly it was meant to be insightful. It's nit only sarcasm that you have trouble detecting, I guess
K5 wrote:Ryan Foreman wrote:is that supposed to be insightful? Clever?
As far as I can tell this thread bottomed out at least 1500 posts ago.
If the powers that be don't delete this thread I may have to threaten you with Ralph Nader or Ron Paul references.
Pretty sure that's an imposter.
dumb wrote:
Here goes K5 on a jew tirade again, good lord
Please see second to last post on link for my true thoughts.
Sally Vixxxens wrote:dumb wrote:Pretty sure that's an imposter.
Here goes K5 on a jew tirade again, good lord
Knock yourself out.
agip wrote:
someone should just go in and register the k5 brand just to frustrate him. them. whatever.