something IS missing here wrote:
missing something here?
RE: The Curious Case of Treniere Moser 8/9/2013 4:58PM - in reply to cynical fan
Reply | Return to Index | Report Post
I am assuming that the picture we are looking at is of the back of two hamstrings as the patient is lying on her stomach? I am also assuming that the white slash down the middle of the hamstrings on the right, is the injury. In her interview, she claims she injured her left hamstring. If these are two hamstrings we are looking at, then the one on the right is obviously her RIGHT hamstring?
____________________________________________________________
isn't anyone else curious about this picture that shows an injured right hamstring, yet she claims to have hurt her left one?
In medical imaging it is standard to show patient left on the right side of the image. It can be hard to get used to but that's how it's done. Imagine you are the doctor and the patient is facing you. Or imagine you are looking at an anatomy text, where the subject is usually facing you.
Forgive me for bringing this thread back from Hades, however, at the time because Moser pulled out of Worlds with an injury, and had PRed by less than half a second in her main event, many folks (I must admit other expressions come to mind) asserted as if fact that she must have been doping--why else drop out of Worlds? And the implication was as soon as Worlds were over, she would run in other races. Well, she hasn't: her season ended with that injury. In the unlikely event some of you might think you were mistaken, the world would not end if you admitted it.
Wakey Wakey wrote:
Montesquieu and Harry;
You do understand there are people on this board that are crazy, right?
The constant accusations against NOP are kind of ridiculous compared to how uneven the results of the athletes often are. I also think you make a great point when you list out all the athletes on NOP and then ask "do you really think they are all doping?" They're just a lot of cynical idiots here. The problem is sometimes the elites lurk here because the sport is so small it doesn't offer a better site somewhere. I think it is not possible for some of the less intelligent and weak minded elites to not "get some on them" by stepping in the dog poo here. --It's a problem. Any of the elite athletes who have any "inside knowledge," know very well how and where to report it."
Forgive the bump as well.
Buffalo Orange wrote:
Congratulations on taking the high road and pointing out the irrationality of the anti-NOP crowd. But don't expect it to change any minds. Too many people who post here just want Salazar's athletes to be dirty, and they'll take ANYTHING as evidence of doping. Run well? You're on the sauce. Run badly? Must have just come off the sauce. Race a lot? No one recovers that well, must be drugged up. Don't race enough? Must be hiding from the testers. Injured? Must be a lie. Actually post a photo of an MRI? It's too small, it's probably from someone else, what are they hiding anyway? I swear, some of these people could watch Moser take the frigging test and still swear the film was switched.
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!