You are good to go wrote:
Don't forget Mutai went on to run 2:05 in New York on what everyone agrees is a tough course. Yes, the tailwind was nice, but not enough to negate the hills from 10 - 22. Boston is more than "fair".
You seem to get worked up very easily and be very negative. That will make life stressful as you get older. Choose to be happy.
I messed up -- it was 2:04:58, of course.
OK, if the tailwind wasn't enough to "negate" the Boston hills (I'm trying hard to hold in derisive laughter at this point -- and where are the hills on that course starting at 10 miles, by the way? Did you mean 17 - 21?), then
1) Why have times at Boston never been close to what they were in 2011? And
2) Why haven't Hall, Mutai, Davila, et al. along with a huge army of recrational marathoners never approached their times from Boston that year, before or since?
I'm honestly not sure which is more mindless: You assuming I'm "worked up" merely because I'm not blowing sunshine out of my butthole in this thread, or the guy beneath you resorting to the usual primitive "If you can't run as fast as X, you can't criticize X" canard. Ryan Hall is a great runner and I neither dispute that not wish him ill -- I'd like nothing more than for him to return to his 2:06 form and he still has plenty of time to do it.