UsedToBeKnowItAll wrote:
I'd go with 5'7". It is comical some of the reasons some of you are giving for choosing 6'7". "I'd get more chicks. I'd have a bigger dong. I could play in the NBA." Is the average age on letsrun 13 years old? Or are many of you like jamin and just can't get laid? Have tiny dongs? It's comical.
What's comical is that you think the average 5'7" guy gets any respect. Sure there are exceptions, but generally, no. 6'7" is not a freak. It's very tall, but not freakish. And yes, it definitely means you'd likely be better at most sports: Basketball, volleyball, baseball (especially pitcher), tennis, boxing, etc. Football.....it's a little tall, but wide receiver/tight end? Better than 5'7". My 12 year old is already 5'10". Yes, he's tall, but he's not a freak. You want to be 3" shorter than some 6th graders??
Unless, you are loaded ($), or famous, or extremely good looking, 5'7" ain't getting you many women. That ain't comical, that's reality.
I mean, look at Flagpole! I rest my case.