2013 NCAA indoors look like they'll be a lot of fun - our previews are now up

That women's writeup was shitty i couldn't even get through it. How do you randomly go out of your way to include a stat that's not even right

off2thegymoon3.14 wrote:

Where is the NCAA Indoors Conference being hosted?

I do not know if it is under the same rules as the conference meets often adopt, butt it might be. In that case, the original seeding of the sections is superseded. This is a dynamic element, since they cannot know the small set of teams that might win the championship and that are in the 4x400. Of course, it might be that no more than one of them is, although it is usually the case that many of the top teams have a 4x400 entry.

The University of Arkansas. Tyson Indoor Track Center

So the Villanova Australians don't want to win as bad as the Americans on Princeton or Penn State?

26mi235 wrote: I do not know if it is under the same rules as the conference meets often adopt, butt it might be. In that case, the original seeding of the sections is superseded. This is a dynamic element, since they cannot know the small set of teams that might win the championship and that are in the 4x400. Of course, it might be that no more than one of them is, although it is usually the case that many of the top teams have a 4x400 entry.

Heats have been posted. No dynamic element, although it would be interesting to have Ark, Kansas, Oregon, LSU women 4x4's all in same heat.

The fact that heats have been posted means nothing if the rule of combining all the possible winning teams is included. Thus, are you saying that you know for sure that there is no such provision or are you relying on the listing of the sections? [please clarify this; I have no specific knowledge of how they have set up the rules]

They really are sections, not heats, since they determine the final order, although that distinction is only really useful for clarity, saying heats in this context is adequate.

As promised: 0 for 1

seems pretty accurate, only 2 points off on the 5000, and Prandini PR\'d and made it to the finals of the 100.

Have you not been paying attention? Oregon's women scored 8 points in the 5K and have advanced every one of their athletes. They had a fantastic first day and may have an even better day if they can score a few points in the DMR.

As usual, they are over-performing and this is why they are 3 time champions.

8 isn't 10-15. He didn't say "about 10 points", he said 10-15. 0 for 1.

Kithuka already creating a gap on the field...

Oregon qualifies 6 of 6 women. Awesome job. Looking like title #4!

right on the money wrote:

seems pretty accurate, only 2 points off on the 5000, and Prandini PR'd and made it to the finals of the 100.

I must've missed the 100m. When did they run it?

Oregon is unstoppable! Total Victory! Quack Quack Quack!!

0 for 2 on day 1

HAHAHAHA, THE OREGON SUCKS!!!

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!

YOU CAN'T BEAT SPRINTERS!

IT'S ALL ABOUT THE KNEE GROWS!

Lipari got owned by a Ginger.

Speaking of sprinters....Let's see how Oregon does tomorrow with English Gardner and Jenna Prandini in the 60 dash, and Phyllyis Francis in the 400 and the Oregon Women in the 4 X 400. These races are their key to a 4th consecutive title.

red power wrote:

Lipari got owned by a Ginger.

Michigan focused on what they wanted to do and then executed. None of the four on the DMR ran an individual event although several met the qualification point (top 16).